How many more losses would Lennox Lewis have if he fought these 5 fighters?

I see a 96 Holyfield and 04 Vitali pretty much as 50/50 fights.

 

the guy who cant lace up vitalis gloves, stopped said prime vitali before halftime in his pre-retirement year.


So, mate, I wonder, you ever heard of the phrase kliturd self destructs once again (K.S.D.O.A)?

 

whilst the holyfield fight would see evander younger and fresher, so would lennox be.
and asking a retiree to fight someone prime is stupid, you shouldn't be doing that.. although it didn't stop wladdie.

 

Lewis around 96 was still honing his skills and looked vulnerable against trialhorse Mercer, while Holyfield demolished Tyson in that period. I would not pick against Lewis here, but I see no reason to favor him at all.

And while I agree that Lewis had every right to retire and proved himself as the superior fighter by stopping Vitali at the end of his career, that fight is still a part of the gauntlet Lewis is supposed to run through, going by the OP.

 

perhaps it would be 50:50, yes, Pugs, but lewis would be closer to his physical prime, in fact in it, so that counts against evander too.

 

Holyfield > Akinwande
Ibeabuchi > Golota
Sanders > Botha

etc

Yes, they would be part of an already stacked career. They are replacements, and much more dangerous ones at that.

 

BCS no, Mendoza made it quite clear it was replacements for them all except post retirement lennox vs vitali (which is just an unfair matchup, facing retired fatties) -

- hes clearly destroyed your post. Its mutually assured Kliturd destruction.


furthermore Ike never won a title, never proved he was consistently world class like golota did. Corrie didn't even prove he was a valid contender, which botha did more than once, and post prison trauma Tyson was 50% of what he was, but on that count alone you might be right he might be better than Grant.

Shame you are only right on that ONE if you rewrote Mendozas rules though.

 

There are far too many variables to consider here, in order to support this train of thought.

 

@Rumsfeld - I think that you are somewhat underestimating the increased calibre of opposition here. I would argue Sanders is a great deal better than the game but limited Botha, that Ibeabuchi with his marvellous workrate and punch and iron chin was miles better than the menatlly disintegrating Golota and that Tyson may have been a headcase but he was much more dangerous the younger he was. As for Vitali I LOL at anybody that would seriously favour Lewis over him at that age. His TKO6 victory was a great achievement but more or less like Schmeling's win over Louis ... unlikely to happen again ...

 

atschatschatsch

Herol self destructs once again. Dude. Stop drinking now.

 

don't pretend u didn't know he was replacing them.