Some reports that I've heard is that he should only have a couple losses, while I've heard others that say a lot of the decisions were fair. So, how many are bad decisions?
guys who fight like him are going to have some disputed decisions---very active with no one-punch kayo power and leaky defense.
i do as well, but since he doesnt have one-punch kayo power (but power nonetheless), it leads to a lot of decisions. A fighter with good defense and decent chin will always give him a good fight, which leads to close decisions, and some wont go his way.
Definitely some were robberies others were close fights where the local fighter got the close rounds. We all have witneseed both scenarios. Glen worked as a construction worker first and boxer second , so he took fights on short notice to supplement his regular pay check. He has a family to feed. To me he exemplifies all those thousands of boxers who take up boxing and pursue it with 99.9% remaining unknown . I don't know if Glen had any amateur boxing background but either way he is a true road warrior with considerable skill and a good punch . All boxers deserve our respect but Glen's work ethic despite the losses and finally good high profile wins truly is unique in the age of hyped-up prima-donnas who haven't the fortitude of " The Road Warrior " Glen Johnson. :hat
He has a bunch of fights that realistically could've gone either way and ended up on the short end of the stick the majority of the time. The only flat out robbery--that I say--were the draw against Daniel Judah, which I thought he blatantly won. Although I thought he deserved to win against Ottke and Branco and probably could've won another 2-3 close assed fights with more favorable judging
