The fight was terrible, slow and hard to judge. I gave it 8-4 Fury but wouldn't argue with a 9-3 or a 7-5. How do you judge a fight where there is so little action?
I gave Wlad 4 rounds. I've watched it twice, with and without commentary and scored it the same. He should've done more in the fight like what he was doing in round 12.
Many rounds were apparently close, but Tyson always landed the best shots and controlled the action, giving Wlad 1 maybe 2 rounds, if someone says 12-0 he's not really wrong, Tyson edged every round, the fight wasn't even remotely close. Also people make it sound like round 12 was Wlad's awakening or something. He landed 4 punches maybe, and Tyson not less that 3, so he barelly s****ped it (if even) at the risk of being knoccked out, and still, only because Tyson had troubles with his shorts