How much credit do you give Holyfield for beating Holmes and Foreman?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Kevelar, May 24, 2018.


  1. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    Exactly !!! Holyfield would not beat a prime foreman or holmes
     
    Ragamuffin likes this.
  2. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    Yes.. Fair
     
  3. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    I seriously doubt that lewis could do to holmes what tyson did to him... It is all about styles .tyson always would be a nigthmare for holmes
     
  4. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,587
    1,568
    Nov 23, 2014
    Lennox appears to be an even more devastating puncher than Tyson. If anything, I would think he would be a worse matchup for Holmes than Tyson.
     
  5. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,168
    6,800
    Nov 22, 2014

    This. I give Holyfield a ton of credit, since George Foreman despite coming out of retirement fought his way back to being a legitimate contender over several years and was ranked 6 in the world when Holyfield beat him.

    Also, I rate Holyfield's win over Holmes much higher than Tyson's, since Tyson beat Holmes coming off a two year layoff after two back to back losses. When Holmes fought Holyfield he was alot more active and was coming off a dominant win over Ray Mercer, who was ranked 5 in the world. Larry also managed to become a legit contender again several years later and was ranked 7 in the world when he challenged McCall for his WBC title and went 12 rounds. The same McCall that ended a prime Lennox Lewis in 2 rounds.