How much of a chance would Ezzard Charles have against Lennox Lewis

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Nov 22, 2017.


  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,247
    11,715
    Sep 21, 2017
    One could argue that Charles was a better fighter than Lewis, but Lewis was so much larger. Could Charles cause an upset against a prime Lewis or is the size difference too much?
     
  2. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,831
    13,125
    Oct 20, 2017
    I think Charles has a good chance. Lewis could be awesome when he was on his game but he didn't always bully smaller guys in the way I'd have expected him to. I think Lewis would win because ultimately he was a very good big fighter but I see Charles giving him trouble along the way. Close points win for Lewis is my call.
     
  3. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    As much chance as Holyfield.

    If they meet in the 1950s Lewis would be 216lb without being an inch shorter.

    If they fight in the 1990s Charles is everything Holyfield is.
     
    lloydturnip and GlaukosTheHammer like this.
  4. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
  5. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,823
    44,501
    Apr 27, 2005
    Slim to none agreed. Charles is the greater fighter but that don't help enough here.
     
  7. Gudetama

    Gudetama Active Member Full Member

    1,037
    914
    Sep 11, 2017
    Better than many. But still slim.
     
  8. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,430
    9,414
    Jul 15, 2008
    Charles was a great , great fighter but not in the highest level at heavyweight and Lennox was too big and too good.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  9. GALVATRON

    GALVATRON Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,694
    4,245
    Oct 30, 2016
    Lewis would be dead in the water before the contract is even signed. Lewis would have caught wind of Charles being avoided at the lower light HW class and panic would set in.

    Lewis went 12 rounds with Billups and Mavrovic, Ezzard went 15 with unbeatable Marciano. Do the math?
     
    ticar likes this.
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    Lewis is easily a top ten ATG heavy Charles definitely is not, add the size and power factor and there is only one outcome here.
     
  11. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,682
    80,951
    Aug 21, 2012
    At their best, Lewis wins.

    That said, Lewis could blow hot and cold and on an off night he's within the scope of Charles to beat.
     
    lloydturnip, Jel and reznick like this.
  12. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Agreed
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  13. ticar

    ticar Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,264
    764
    Dec 7, 2008
    Charles is a more skilled boxer so he would win cause size and strength doesn't mean anything in boxing, especially if you do weight lifting like Lewis did - that's an artifical size and strength.

    Only skills, speed and stamina.
     
    GALVATRON likes this.
  14. GALVATRON

    GALVATRON Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,694
    4,245
    Oct 30, 2016
    Ezzard would be a 25 to 1 favorite in his day, they would laugh at someone like Lewis...they would say oh look another huge Hw who can't fight proper like the small guys.
     
    ticar likes this.
  15. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,247
    11,715
    Sep 21, 2017
    Your sarcasm is duly noted. I pick Lewis to win myself. Size and strength does mean something, though Charles had the skill level to MAYBE overcome it.