How Much Should Olympic/Amateur Pedigree Affect ATG ranks?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by modernfonzie, May 22, 2014.


  1. modernfonzie

    modernfonzie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,595
    8
    Aug 25, 2013
    A lot of people talk about what fighters accomplish in the pro game, but every other Hall Of Fame counts everything as a whole.

    The Basketball Hall Of Fame takes into consideration College, and Olympics.
    So does Tennis and a lot of other sports.

    Ex: A lot of people say "Wlad has never beaten a HOF" while that's true he's also a Gold Medalist in the 1996 Olympic Games in Atlanta, along with a solid professional career. While Roberto Duran had no Amateur Olympic/Pedigree but went on to have an amazing Pro Career.


    So how much credit should be given for a fighters amateur/olympic pedigree, how should it effect their resume and why do you feel that way?
     
  2. boxing_master

    boxing_master Loyal Member banned

    32,973
    14
    Jul 21, 2013
    duckweather lost alot in the AMS because he couldn't cherry pick back then .....
     
  3. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    It's quite the accomplishment just being chosen to be on any olympic team. Honorable mention or added plus, I can understand that, but no, ultimately shouldn't affect a fighter's placing in the hof. Just think how many college standouts and first round drafts have failed high expectations in football. Boxing has had several of those too.
     
  4. modernfonzie

    modernfonzie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,595
    8
    Aug 25, 2013
    True, but shouldn't you get credit for doing both?
     
  5. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    Yeah I agree, I think Lomachenko, Kindelan, Savon, Rigo etc. should all be in the HOF.

    HOF shouldn't be just pro boxing. Lazlo Papp didn't exactly have a big pro career for political reasons, but he was elected into HOF.

    You can't cherry pick in the amateurs, and losses are very common over there. We say 'wow look at Savon and Stevenson' yet they had 22-25 losses.

    We look at Robeisy Ramirez right now who's the Olympic champion but he's around 75-12.

    Try telling me Felix Savon shouldn't be in the Hall of Fame:
    Olympic Games
    Gold 1992 Barcelona Heavyweight
    Gold 1996 Atlanta Heavyweight
    Gold 2000 Sydney Heavyweight

    World Amateur Championships
    Gold 1986 Reno Heavyweight
    Gold 1989 Moscow Heavyweight
    Gold 1991 Sydney Heavyweight
    Gold 1993 Tampere Heavyweight
    Gold 1995 Berlin Heavyweight
    Gold 1997 Budapest Heavyweight
    Silver 1999 Houston Heavyweight (Felix chose not to fight as protest)

    Pan American Games
    Gold 1987 Indianapolis Heavyweight
    Gold 1991 Havana Heavyweight
    Gold 1995 March del Plata Heavyweight

    Central American and Caribbean Games
    Gold 1986 Santiago Heavyweight
    Gold 1990 Mexico City Heavyweight
    Gold 1993 Ponce Heavyweight
    Gold 1998 Maracaibo Heavyweight
     
  6. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    Of course, but it depends from whom you want to get credit from. Mainstream media or hardcore fans. Tough to get both. I think of it as a stepping stone for the pro/paid ranks, and you're supposed to eventually improve once you're a pro. A great amateur makes people wonder what could have been as a pro, as a pro people have no doubts about you because they know what you're about. Many legends will say winning a gold medal was their most memorable accomplishment, but that's not what fans will remember them for. Depends who you ask. Sometimes a scenario where fighter A beats fighter B in the ams and mainstream media aren't aware of it, but fighter B has huge success in the pros and fighter A is unknown, best way to remove doubts is in the pro ranks. Remember also many Mexican legends had few amateur fights and reached the highest pinnacles in boxing. So yes you should get credit for both, but no, it doesn't or shouldn't affect your hof standing. Just because your a gold medalist shouldn't guarantee you a spot in Canastota, but like the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, seems to be getting easier for fighters to get in and many don't deserve to be there.
     
  7. MrFoFody

    MrFoFody Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,735
    1,661
    Dec 17, 2005
    None.
    Just because your a mature adult winning multiple olympic medals against very young not fully developed men, does not mean you would have been a good pro boxer.
     
  8. Collie

    Collie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,638
    8
    Jun 16, 2012
    Its the Olympics not the fights in th bike shed after school.

    The likes of Sylvester Stallone is in the HOF, I think they can make space for the likes of Rigo, who is and has been one of the best in both pro and amateur.
     
  9. ArseBandit

    ArseBandit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,547
    2,366
    Apr 22, 2012
    Record of 84-6 including two blatant robberies.

    Apparently Lost alot of times :patsch



    Mayweather had an excellent amatuer record.
     
  10. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    Ya when you think about it to have Stallone in the hall of fame and no Savon and Stevenson really puts things into perspective
     
  11. MrFoFody

    MrFoFody Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,735
    1,661
    Dec 17, 2005
    Oh, so the outcome of previous olympics would have been the same if Wlad, tyson, Holyfield, etc would have been allowed back into the Olympics during their pro carrers? After all, theyare all grown men that have been trained to box...
     
  12. miniq

    miniq AJ IS A BODYBUILDING BUM Full Member

    47,858
    27,819
    Oct 23, 2011
    Never even thought about this.

    what the actual fck.

    screw Stallone.
     
  13. Collie

    Collie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,638
    8
    Jun 16, 2012
    The Olympics may have been different if pros were allowed back in, but that's hardly to say that the amateurs are crap because they would probably get beaten by HOF pros with years more training and experience, who were themselves great amateurs anyway. But I think you'll find that most gold medalists and Olympians are 'grown men that have been trained to box.'

    Have you ever even watched the Olympics? Many professionals wouldn't and didn't win medals at the Olympics, there is only one Olympic gold medalist every 4 years in the weight category whereas nowadays there are 4-5 'champions' in each weight division in the pro game.
     
  14. ArseBandit

    ArseBandit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,547
    2,366
    Apr 22, 2012
    Screw the BHOF. Hardly Sly's fault those jokers put him in it.
     
  15. modernfonzie

    modernfonzie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,595
    8
    Aug 25, 2013
    I didn't even know that. thefuq?