How much significance do you place on a fighter "coming off a loss"?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Jan 6, 2011.


Page 4 of 5
  1. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    :rofl

    That was a disqualification you Nugget.

    The Naz and MAB fight was as demoralising as Hattons head being shoved in the ring post and knocking him over, and so was Tarvers statement of Any excuses tonight roy before ktfo of roy.

    I mean seriously can you imagine that, the ko wasnt embarrasing it was the fact that he got called out during the referees instructions and put away in easy fashion

    If Naz lost in a close fight he would have carried on fighting easy but he got shown up in his mind, therefore demoralised.
     
    spud1, Jan 6, 2011
    spud1, Jan 6, 2011
    #46
  2. horst

    horst Guest

    A DQ is still a loss, imbecile. :patsch

    Nonsense.

    Naz kept plugging away all fight, got outjabbed and outboxed over the course, and lost a 9-3 type decision.

    How the **** does that equate to getting beaten down and knocked the **** out?! :nut
     
    horst, Jan 6, 2011
    horst, Jan 6, 2011
    #47
  3. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    My oh my you are a sensitive little boy arent you.:lol:

    Something tells me you need an ego stroke.
     
    spud1, Jan 6, 2011
    spud1, Jan 6, 2011
    #48
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    fact is that fighters are most underrated when they are coming off losses and often have the most to prove therefore train harder than ever.
     
    PH|LLA, Jan 6, 2011
    PH|LLA, Jan 6, 2011
    #49
  5. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    Yeah ok we get it you're a nugget.

    He got demoralised fact, if he never got shamed in his own eyes he would have continued to fight and just played it down as his god saying he didnt do something right.

    YDKSAB:rofl
     
    spud1, Jan 6, 2011
    spud1, Jan 6, 2011
    #50
  6. horst

    horst Guest

    Yep, he let a points loss demoralize him because he was a mentally weak fighter and person. It was not a devastating defeat by any standard, nothing like a Duran-Moore style loss.
     
    horst, Jan 6, 2011
    horst, Jan 6, 2011
    #51
  7. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,225
    15
    Sep 19, 2009
    it still depends on the quality of the boxer that shows up in the ring
     
    Leonard, Jan 6, 2011
    Leonard, Jan 6, 2011
    #52
  8. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    It doesnt have to be brutal to be demoralising, if you gt outclassed and you consider yoursel so highly like Naz did, tat loss and the manner in which he lost would degrade him.

    You've been no where near a ring stay away from boxercise class.
     
    spud1, Jan 6, 2011
    spud1, Jan 6, 2011
    #53
  9. horst

    horst Guest

    Naz allowed a loss to demoralize him which shouldn't have demoralized him. He was mentally weak. Lesser fighters have came back stronger after far more devastating losses. You yourself agree with me that it was Naz's own mentality which scuppered his career! :nut

    I box, in a boxing ring. You box up boxes in a warehouse somewhere, blue collar boy. :D
     
    horst, Jan 6, 2011
    horst, Jan 6, 2011
    #54
  10. nuketurnal

    nuketurnal N-Bomb Full Member

    2,090
    0
    Apr 24, 2010
    Mayweather is on a run of great wins, how come he's lacking some of that 'thing'?

    Nah, i'm just kiddin.
     
    nuketurnal, Jan 6, 2011
    nuketurnal, Jan 6, 2011
    #55
  11. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    It shouldnt of demoraised him but it did, mentally wrecking him in the process and erm dont know if you forgot but boxing is mental therefore even if the loss is not brutal the fighter can be effected and not being the same prior to that defeat.

    Get it?

    I understand your a beginner theres only two groups of people in boxing outside of casual fans that dont get why boxing is more mental that it is physical they are pac stans and beginners:good.
     
    spud1, Jan 6, 2011
    spud1, Jan 6, 2011
    #56
  12. horst

    horst Guest

    Yup, you are still agreeing with me. Naz's loss was not devastating at all, but because of his mental weakness he let it destroy his career.

    To say that boxing is more mental than physical is idiotic. Yes, it sounds very smart to say so, but in reality it's bull****. All three aspects are important (physical, mental, skills), but skills is the most important.

    Mentally weak/unstable fighters can have success in their careers (eg Golota).

    People with no boxing skills cannot have successful boxing careers.

    This is ****ing basic.
     
    horst, Jan 6, 2011
    horst, Jan 6, 2011
    #57
  13. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    :tired

    :lol::rofl:patsch

    I didnt just see this did i.

    You definitely are getting boxercise class and a boxing gym mixed up.

    ****ing clown.

    i never at no time said that Nazs loss was devastating, i stated it was demoralisng, big difference you nugget.
     
    spud1, Jan 6, 2011
    spud1, Jan 6, 2011
    #58
  14. horst

    horst Guest

    OK then, boxing is more mental than physical.

    A fat 68 year old slob who had never been inside a gym but was super-confident in himself could tie on a pair of gloves and outbox someone with less self-confidence but far more ability and in far better physical shape.

    :nut:nut:nut

    Hamed's loss was not a particularly demoralizing loss, many fighters have came back from much more demoralizing losses. He was competitive throughout, and was never hurt.

    He simply allowed it to demoralize him, you box-packing blue-collar factory rodent. :smoke
     
    horst, Jan 6, 2011
    horst, Jan 6, 2011
    #59
  15. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    what fat 68 yr old man boxes?

    within reason boxing is more mental than physical.

    and any person who was not a beginner at a boxercise session would know this.

    blue collar? factory worker? since when sam
     
    spud1, Jan 6, 2011
    spud1, Jan 6, 2011
    #60
Page 4 of 5