How much would Liston, Shavers, Lyle, and Norton add to Joe Frazier's resume?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, May 18, 2016.


  1. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    How much would Liston, Shavers, Lyle, and Norton add to Joe Frazier's resume? Frazier pretty much has few punches on his resume outside or Foreman who bounced him out. All four of these men are top all time 75 heavyweights. At any rate had Frazier fought and beaten them, how much of a legacy boost would he receive? I added a new moderate legacy boost for the poll, which would have best described my thought on the Lewis legacy boost thread.

    Assume the Liston fight took place in 1968 and the others from 1972-1975, pre-Manilla.
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    I voted for Significant. If Frazier had only beaten two of these four men, I'd have a tough time deciding between clear and moderate.
     
  3. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    liston - hof

    shavers -hardesr puncher ever
    Norton -hof

    of course these would be major boosts.
     
  4. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,598
    5,500
    Jan 19, 2016
    Add those men to his CV and, with the Ali win, he is second only to Ali for me. Maybe only Holyfield and Lewis could claim to have as many names on their records as Joe would have, had he fought these men.

    That's assuming he meets them at their peaks which are somehow synched to 1970 or so. If he beats them in his 68-73 reign as they were then - Liston being on the slide and the others yet to reach their peaks - then it doesn't add quite so much lustre to the legacy.
     
  5. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    Yet Frazier was busy giving re-matches to Quarry and Ellis in 1974 and 1975.

    Was there really any need to fight Stander or Daniels in title fights?
     
  6. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    1974- 1975 yeh cool.
    yeh sure mate! frazier shouldda dug up listons corpse and propped it up in the ring for a title defence,

    what kind of thick are you? Kliturd self destructs once again. wit a frakking atom bomb no less.
     
  7. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,695
    14,075
    Jan 4, 2008
    Quarry had wiped the floor with both Shavers and Lyle, so rematching him was clearly superior to facing one of them. The rematch with Ellis gave close to nothing, though. And the defenses against Stander and Daniels were pretty shameful. I can buy one gimme defence after FOTC, but two such weak defenses as the only ones in two years...

    In the end this would amount to beating three good contenders and a faded former champion. Yeah, that would be a boost. Not like winning the rematch with Foreman, but still a boost.
     
  8. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,695
    14,075
    Jan 4, 2008
    Even with these wins he wouldn't have close to the amount of wins over ranked opponents that Louis, Ali or even Holmes or Wlad have. And he'd still have the crushing defeats Foreman... He wouldn't be close to my top 3.
     
  9. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    I said, Assume the Liston fight took place in 1968 and the others from 1972-1975, pre-Manilla. Re-read post one again.

    See, your hatred prevents objective reasoning and impairs your reading comprehension.

    I'll say it again, you two are not even bright enough to make good haters. If I were President of the anti-Klitschko club, I'd kick you out as you would badly damage the group's ability to be taken seriously.
     
  10. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    liston was nearly 50 by then, fool.

    the only way it adds to his legacy is if he fights him in the way up while liston is still turning 40.
     
  11. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,475
    Jan 6, 2007
    Frazier was wise not to mess with Liston.

    Norton and Frazier were "friends" and agreed not to fight.

    Shavers & Lyle would have been good wins if accomplished.
     
  12. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010

    if u were kicked outta the kliturd club their average IQ would hit double figures overnight.
     
  13. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    You can't even acknowledge your mistakes on the first post.

    By 1968, Liston was 38-year-old. Far from 50, and under 40 where you say it would add to his Frazier's legacy. :lol:

    Now if you think 38 is too old, you should not really count Wlad being 39 and 40 for the rematch vs Fury....but you will and accept the double standard.

    I'll say it again, I don't mind you and Dino. You actually do more for Wlad than you realize, showing open hatred combined with really bad boxing ****ysis.
     
  14. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    149
    Dec 7, 2015
    it's Would hurt his legacy because he would lose lol
     
  15. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    i'm fine with 1968, why u pretending I cant acknowledge it?

    how do you know, you seen his birth certificate. no one has. FLOP mate.

    general opinion was he was close to 40 when he faced ali. he looked even older.