How often did late 1800s/early 1900s fight people see the greats of their eras?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, May 5, 2018.


  1. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,494
    3,722
    Apr 20, 2010
    Edit: wrong post
     
    Last edited: May 8, 2018
  2. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,588
    Jan 30, 2014
    Anyone else have any thoughts or info?
     
  3. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    13,259
    6,755
    Jun 30, 2005
    My opinion, for what it's worth:

    If somebody cites a famous sports writer as an authority that Fighter X was the best of all time, onus is on the poster to demonstrate that the famous sports writer had actually seen any boxing matches and knew what he was talking about.

    If somebody cites a fighter's opinion, on the other hand, they just need to demonstrate that the fighter actually saw the guy he's opining about. Professionals have an automatic claim to credibility when assessing other professionals.
     
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,588
    Jan 30, 2014
    A couple random tidbits:

    Kid McCoy was apparently present at Corbett-Jackson. From a January 22, 1894 article with predictions on Corbett-Mitchell I forgot I'd saved:

    "Kid McCoy of Boston--Corbett in 30 rounds at 100 to 75 in his favor. I saw the fight between Jackson and Corbett. Peter could not land on Jim, although the colored boxer had a longer reach than Corbett. I don't see how Mitchell can hope to land on the American hard enough to hurt him."

    Incidentally, in the same article a line from Mitchell's trainer makes me believe that Mitchell and his trainer had not seen Corbett fight before. "From information received in regard to Corbett's ducking, I feel certain that a few of Mitchell's uppercuts will have his neck so sore that he will have to resort to some other method than ducking to have a chance of success."
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2019
    Mendoza and reznick like this.
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,852
    29,305
    Jun 2, 2006
    When Sam Langford and Tommy Burns were introduced to each other neither had seen the other in the flesh,yet both were born in Canada.
     
    Seamus and reznick like this.
  6. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,643
    1,918
    Dec 2, 2006
    If you read the write up on the big early fights, they often contain a list of prominent ringsiders, boxers, boxing men, politicians, gamblers, newspapers people, criminals, and they regularly repeat.
     
  7. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,494
    3,722
    Apr 20, 2010
    I feel the exact opposite is the case. Nearly all boxers/trainers/journalists will say whatever it takes to make themselves, or their era, look good.

    There are some very knowledgeable "non-professionals" on this forum, whose opinions I value much more.
     
  8. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,636
    16,329
    Jul 19, 2004
    I generally tend to agree where I embrace a "trust the art, not the artist" outlook.
     
  9. Sting like a bean

    Sting like a bean Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,047
    1,594
    Apr 9, 2017
    A minor nitpick, but mass transportation was readily available in the nineteenth century, and arguably more comfortable than traveling by modern automobile. You just had to plan ahead a little more.
     
    louis54 likes this.
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,852
    29,305
    Jun 2, 2006
    McCoy was a huge fan of Corbett's, I wouldn't look for objectivity is his opinion.
     
  11. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007
    I would say the promoters, referees, news paper writers and managers saw the most of the old time fighters.

    In the early filmed era of boxing, sparring partners who fought the opponent was highly sought after.
     
  12. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,657
    9,750
    Jul 15, 2008
    Excellent question because the far majority of most did not .. not only that but when Joe Louis fought Ezzard Charles there was a window of time when Louis's stock went down because the overwhelming majority had never , ever seen Louis fight before this televised bout and the word was he really wasn't that good .. so much of the auras around so many of the fighters is based on newspaper coverage and we all know how reliable that can be even today.
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.