how old is 'old' for a heavyweight..

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by doug.ie, Sep 18, 2008.


  1. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    i had a thread similar to this a while back...

    with mercer calling for a shot at haye...and the likes of toney etc...
    and even at light heavy calzaghe, jones, hopkins, tarver...

    what do you consider old for, taking heavyweight as an example, a modern heavyweight...
     
  2. smiffy

    smiffy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,420
    0
    May 14, 2008
  3. fidds

    fidds Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,672
    106
    Mar 15, 2006
    36 upwards i think
     
  4. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
    When even Don King doesnt want you to fight anymore.
     
  5. fidds

    fidds Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,672
    106
    Mar 15, 2006
    I mean age is relative, you get the very rare fighter who can be successful to a point in the 40's. Obviously george foreman and larry holmes etc....


    But for everyone of those you get 2000 that aren't
     
  6. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,058
    17,558
    Apr 26, 2006
    Depends....most heavies are still pretty good at 40 ...guys like Moorer , McCall, Holyfield , Mercer , could beat some top 20 hw ,s outthere...
     
  7. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    yes.

    but taken as an 'average' heavyweight...whats old ?
     
  8. saturday_kid

    saturday_kid Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,688
    0
    Sep 3, 2008
  9. fidds

    fidds Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,672
    106
    Mar 15, 2006
    I already posted it up earlier i think 36 regardless who you are, you have seen better days.

    No fighter past 36 is at there peak :good
     
  10. AussieMauler

    AussieMauler Relative Unknown Full Member

    1,002
    0
    Jul 29, 2004
    When you get to Holyfield turn left
     
  11. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    my thoughts were exactly the same...but still asked due to so many around-40 year olds at top level these days...
     
  12. FROST

    FROST Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,529
    76
    May 3, 2006
    37-38 is old for a HW, but some 'old' HWs can still be good. They are past their primes, but they still have something left, and in todays weak division that's often enough to be competitve with the best.
    Toney, McCall, Golota, Holyfield, they've all got something left and can still be competitive (to various degrees). Foreman proved that you can still become a champ (or beltholder) at 45, so I think they all believe they can do it too...
    Hell, even old Mercer can still beat fighters...
     
  13. Box-on

    Box-on Member Full Member

    472
    1
    Apr 17, 2005
  14. KlitschkoUKR

    KlitschkoUKR Member Full Member

    444
    0
    Sep 10, 2008
    It all depends on the career the heavyweight had. If they had a long amateur background than probably 35. If not than 40.
     
  15. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    When you gotta take artritis shots in the corner