How should history remember Esteban De Jesus?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Jan 14, 2012.


  1. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,432
    32
    Dec 18, 2011
    not necessarily disagreeing but what's your criteria for that ranking?
     
  2. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    A world class fighter and a tremendous one, great to watch.
     
  3. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    I don't really have divisional rankings, but at a rough guess I'd say he'd be lucky to squeeze into the bottom of a top 20 at lightweight.

    I mean, when you consider the following names:

    Leonard
    Duran
    Armstrong
    Gans
    Ross
    Williams
    Whitaker
    Chavez
    Canzoneri
    Ortiz
    Arguello
    Jack
    Welsh
    Ambers
    Tendler
    Montgomery
    Angott

    I think he'd be clearly below them.

    Then you have the likes of Buchanan, De la Hoya, Mayweather, Laguna, Brown, Carter, Joyce, Dawson, Lavigne, McAuliffe, Nelson, Ritchie, Ramey and probably about at least 10 others you could name that are likely candidates to fill out a top 20. I think Dejesus would be one of those ten.


    Of coruse you also have names like McFarland, Loi, Locche, Napoles, Blackburn, Holly, Dundee, etc that could be ranked at lightweight as well... but are probably better suited to other divisions.

    Like I said though, I don't do divisional rankings and if we strictly look at what was done at the weight, you could probably poke quite a few holes in my argument, e.g. did Chavez, Arguello, Whitaker, really do that much at lightweight to have such high places?
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,290
    21,761
    Sep 15, 2009
    I'd agree. Top 30 seems fair.