How should the purse be split for Wlad vs Haye?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DOM5153, Apr 12, 2010.


  1. jaffay

    jaffay New Orleans Hornets Full Member

    3,980
    18
    Jun 24, 2007
    60/40 for Wlad sounds to be fair
     
  2. Gsand

    Gsand Active Member Full Member

    1,407
    0
    Dec 13, 2004
    that doesnt work because the fight wont be PPV in Germany/Eastern Europe and will be in the UK

    the likely outcome here in my view is either:

    (i) 50/50 split of all revenues (based on the fact Wlad would be getting a bonus from UK PPV)

    or

    (ii) 60/40, Wlad taking the 60% of the purse but Haye keeping UK PPV revenues and USA being shared.
     
  3. RJD

    RJD Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,782
    0
    Dec 23, 2007
    Haye should just look to keep 100% of the UK revenue. The fight will most likely do over 1 million buys in the UK. Haye/Valuev did around 800k buys.
     
  4. homebrand

    homebrand Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,674
    3
    Jan 1, 2009
    60 to the winner. 40 to the loser.
     
  5. rusticraver

    rusticraver Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,563
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    50/50 seeing as Haye is a two weight world champion and will bring the fight
     
  6. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,188
    27,906
    Jan 18, 2010
    I agree with 3 out of 4 people here that Wlad should get the bigger split... 60/40
     
  7. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,097
    1,094
    Jul 19, 2004

    only up to page 2 so far, but i agree with your assesment of how the split should be done .
     
  8. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,097
    1,094
    Jul 19, 2004
    never heard this before.

    the fight haye walked away from conditions were fight was in germany

    wlad got all gate money
    wlad got all german tv money
    wlad got all usa money.

    haye got all setanta irish tv money, there was no english money for this fight.

    haye agreed but then backed out when setanta got into trouble financially and thougyht he might not get a single penny.

    before the fight would have taken place setanta`s uk operations went bust and haye would not have received a single penny for a wlad fight if it had actually gone ahead.
     
  9. Loggo

    Loggo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,029
    2
    Mar 26, 2006
    60/40 in Wlads favour although i said 65/35.Haye just doesn`t deserve anymore.If Haye passes this one up again,i dread to think awful Audley could end up pipping him to it but then again he should get flattened by Dimitrenko.
     
  10. bkamins

    bkamins Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,465
    2
    Sep 29, 2008


    I know it's difficult to see all side with only one eye, but did you consider the fact that Haye hasn't been able to get a fight with HBO either? I mean, here's this young, exciting champ from the UK fright in a sold out 02 arean against a familiar name from the US and the HBO says, "Nah...I think we'll pass." Obviously, they don't want anything to do with Haye either. :D
     
  11. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    and thats exactly why Golden Boy promotions are showing a huge interest in Haye, they can make him a star in America, the boat has sadly already passed the Klitchko brothers by.
     
  12. Lunny

    Lunny Guest

    I always like the idea of 40-40 then the winner's share gets bumped up to 60.
     
  13. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    that would be in an ideal world:good
     
  14. Dr Obnoxious

    Dr Obnoxious Sesame Street Heavyweight Full Member

    354
    0
    Feb 14, 2010
    30-30 and the remianing 40% to the winner. ALL fights should be on a similar basis.
     
  15. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    a bit too far imo, especially a fight of this magnitude, i doubt Wlad or Haye would risk getting such a small share of the purse.:good