Inspired by a thread in the GF that asks if Wilder's performance in his most recent loss cements his HW ATG status, I'm wondering how posters in this forum define the term. For this thread, let's just consider the HWs. If you have a list, where is the cut-off in that list...top 10...top 20...top 50...top 100 ? Given the sheer number of professional HWs who have boxed in the past century and a quarter (at least 40,000), being in the top hundred would put a boxer in the top quarter of the top one percent, a distinction that might garner ATG status. If you decided that one HW in a thousand merited ATG status, then your top forty would make the cut. Or do you have some other criteria for the honour ? I would like to hear from the very serious "students" among you, @cross_trainer, @Stonehands89, @McGrain @Rumsfeld, @JohnThomas1, @IntentionalButt, @kirk , @lufcrazy and all the other 'biggies' who are slipping my mind at the minute. Everybody...give me your take...please.