How Tarver defeated Roy Jones

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Apr 2, 2020.


  1. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,118
    11,512
    Mar 7, 2012
    No.

    I’m saying they were only amateur rivals as young kids.

    Tarver turned pro as a LHW.
     
  2. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,118
    11,512
    Mar 7, 2012
    Tarver didn’t turn pro until he was 28.

    Although he’s a few months older than Roy, he was much fresher when they fought.

    Roy had fought 49 times, across 4 divisions.
     
  3. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,770
    20,222
    Apr 3, 2012
    I don’t think you follow. Tarver aged better than Roy, but these guys were both full 175s at the same age. Roy’s absolute prime has little bearing on that.
     
  4. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,118
    11,512
    Mar 7, 2012
    Of course he aged better.

    He didn’t have as many miles on the clock.
     
  5. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,770
    20,222
    Apr 3, 2012
    Roy was at 175 around the time Tarver finished with the Olympics. Tarver is older. Stop already.
     
    mark ant likes this.
  6. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,770
    20,222
    Apr 3, 2012
    He also had a technical style that wasn’t as dependent on athleticism and didn’t have the self doubt that comes with having your head put in orbit.
     
  7. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,118
    11,512
    Mar 7, 2012
    Stop with what?
     
  8. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,118
    11,512
    Mar 7, 2012
    What point are you trying to make?

    Why did you say he was older?

    What exactly are you wanting to say?
     
  9. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,770
    20,222
    Apr 3, 2012
    I’m saying anything and everything will be done to downplay what Tarver accomplished in boxing and what his talent level was.
     
  10. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,118
    11,512
    Mar 7, 2012
    I hope not.

    Why?
     
  11. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,770
    20,222
    Apr 3, 2012
    Direct me to a fantasy fight in this forum that he has come out winning.
     
    Fury's Love Handles likes this.
  12. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,653
    16,584
    May 4, 2017
    How many punches did he land, what are you talking about, I didn`t even notice that round.
     
  13. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,886
    Feb 23, 2020
    That's a good point. Tarver is underrated in fantasy fights probably due to his inconsistency and relatively short prime.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    72,003
    28,023
    Feb 15, 2006
    I suspect that there will be a bit of a Jersey Joe Walcott effect with Antonio Tarver, and Geln Johnson for that matter.

    People will look back at their careers, and they will gain currency!
     
  15. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,118
    11,512
    Mar 7, 2012
    His win over Roy was great. But people are only telling it how it is.

    Prime for prime, Roy would always have been the favourite.

    Roy beat Tarver in the first fight, despite the fact that he was absolutely exhausted due to losing muscle in only a few months. And he was past his prime then, having had 49 fights.

    In the rematch, Tarver landed a beautiful shot.

    In the 3rd fight, Roy hadn’t fought in over a year and he was coming off of 2 back to back knockout losses. Yet he gave a good account of himself.

    The versions of Roy from the mid to late 90’s, were better than the versions that Tarver fought. He was fresher. So all things considered, of course people are going to pick a prime version of Roy over him. Why wouldn’t they?