How to score a round

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PH|LLA, Dec 10, 2007.


  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    The one and only right way to score a round:

    Ask yourself this question:

    Who inflicted more damage on his opponent during the round?

    Ring generalship, effective agression, clean punching, defence, blah blah blah. In the end the only thing that matters is the question I wrote above.
     
  2. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
    clean effective punches...
     
  3. doomeddisciple

    doomeddisciple Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,001
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
    So with that logic - If you throw one puinch in three minutes that cuts an opponent after say they've landed 30 punches on you - You should win the round cause they're cut?

    There are four criteria, they are subjective but form a decent enough basis from which to judge a round.
     
  4. G_RapPBF

    G_RapPBF Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,985
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    I score on clean effective punching. Total punches landed next. And if nobody is landing a punch I go on aggression by default.
     
  5. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    why? if your opponent lands 30 punches on you and hurts you and you manage to create a cut with a punch, he still inflicted more damage to you.
     
  6. they_killed_kenny

    they_killed_kenny Underdogs on top :) Full Member

    1,461
    0
    Aug 1, 2004

    hmm not necesary...... let put for instance Spinks vs Mayorga, it was clearly that Mayo was landing the more damaging power punches but Cory outsmrt him by pot shoting his way to victory, so overall in most rounds Mayorga did the dmg but cory wont the round....
     
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    All in all, Spinks was damaging Mayorga more with the accumulation of potshots than the few hard shots that Mayorga was partially landing.
     
  8. Brooklyn Boxer

    Brooklyn Boxer Active Member Full Member

    1,232
    0
    Sep 8, 2007
    I judge it by clean punches, ring generalship, and defense. You can't judge it on damage alone because not every fighter can damage the other fighter and that would mean that fighter would have no chance to win because he can't hurt the other guy.
     
  9. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Not true at all.

    Often the weaker puncher can land more shots and therefore cause more damage than the harder puncher who is barely landing anything.

    by the way i almost always score the fight like the judges do. Exept in clear cut robberies.
     
  10. G_RapPBF

    G_RapPBF Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,985
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    Basically Joe Calzaghe would be 0-44 or whatever if you judged by damage lol.
     
  11. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    I'm not pretending to be an expert but you're already misguided when you "say who inflicted more damage".

    In a "ten points must system" . . . fights are scored per round on who ever connected more clean punches. Therefore a fighter who connected with 2 damaging punches that busted the opponent's face, lips or nose may still lose that round if the opponent connected with more clean punches even if there's no notable effects.

    Note that there are a lot of cases where the winning fighter has more marks and welch in the face than the loser. :yep :lol: :good
     
  12. Brooklyn Boxer

    Brooklyn Boxer Active Member Full Member

    1,232
    0
    Sep 8, 2007
    The perfect example for this argument for this question is the Paulie vs Cotto fight. Cotto did the more damage but Paulie was more active and made it a close fight. I believe Cotto won a pretty close fight but his fans think he killed Paulie because of damage. I feel you can't judge a whole fight on damage but it should be included while judging a fight.
     
  13. doomeddisciple

    doomeddisciple Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,001
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
    How about Hatton Vs Phillips for example.

    Ricky looked like Phillips was boxing with baseball bats.
     
  14. Doc BNB

    Doc BNB New Member Full Member

    84
    0
    Aug 12, 2006
    Another example is Leonard-Duran 3.

    To quote Larry Merchant:

    "Never have I seen Ray Leonard look so bad...while looking so good." Referring to the fact that Leonard won a wide decision but had cuts over both eyes and his lip, while Duran had no major marks.
     
  15. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007

    :good chavez vs taylor also