How were fans back in the 50s? 40s?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mycooloriginals, Dec 30, 2012.


  1. mycooloriginals

    mycooloriginals Member Full Member

    232
    0
    Nov 12, 2010
    I'm curious of the attitudes of fans in different eras.

    1.) How were fans back in the past? Were they as fickle? Did they hop on bandwagons, follow the hype, and abandon their favorite fighters once they started to lose?

    2.) Also, during fights, what was their threshold for excitement? Did they need the fighters to always be on the offensive? Would they boo if the fighters engaged in a boxing match rather than brawl?
    If fans did not boo, could this be attributed to the greater boxing knowledge that the average boxing fan knew? Or did it reflect the demographic of the audience or just the culture of the time?

    Or maybe they were exactly the same as people today?

    Thoughts? :D
     
  2. motownsiu

    motownsiu Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,009
    4
    May 6, 2009
    i can only imagine most general fans knew more about boxing than this generations casual fans since it was more mainstream back then.
     
  3. godlikerich

    godlikerich Active Member Full Member

    1,188
    1
    Aug 27, 2010
    Not so damning of fighters after a loss.
     
  4. FloydPatterson

    FloydPatterson Boxing Addict banned

    6,610
    3
    Apr 6, 2012
    Go watch Floyd Patterson vs Oscar Bonavena.

    New York rode for this man.
     
  5. unsigned_userv2

    unsigned_userv2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,138
    0
    Sep 3, 2010

    People were pretty much exactly the same. It's human nature to look favourably on the past and call it the 'good 'ol days'. Sure boxing was more mainstream but now anyone with an internet connection and youtube can view a fight from the other side of the world.

    Did fight fans crave offensive fighters? Absolutely. Why do you think an offensive animal like Jack Dempsey found so much success yet a defensive wizard like Gene Tunney struggled to capture the imaginations of the people.

    The real difference is perception caused by the ease of information and global information. What essentially was 'local barbershop talk' and national newspaper articles have been replaced with 24/7 access to the opinions of people from around the world.

    Every generation has hardcore fans, casual fans and bandwagoners.
     
  6. mycooloriginals

    mycooloriginals Member Full Member

    232
    0
    Nov 12, 2010
    Very interesting. I never took into consideration the unlimited access to global info these days.
     
  7. ThaWiseJester

    ThaWiseJester Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,401
    1
    Mar 28, 2009
    I am sure you had guys saying "this guy is a bum" etc.. but I know that with the internet it has created an environment of trolls.. So with people being able to express their opinions more openly and easily everyone becomes a critic,which over time means more people do not respect the sport or fighters the way they should for the most part..
     
  8. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Fans in general were more knowledgeable because they were more exposed to the sport firsthand. Fewer fans today actually participate in the sport or have firsthand knowledge of it beyond being a fan, which creates a disconnect between the fighters and fans that wasn't there 70 years ago. Between that and of the inability to troll anonymously, like today, I believe that fans were more respectful of the fighters then than now.
     
  9. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Yes, very accurate IMO.
     
  10. Urone2

    Urone2 Active Member Full Member

    841
    1
    Feb 2, 2008
    I believe the fan were more respectful of fighters, back in the 40's and 50's the fighters were their modern day heros. Most men at some point wanted to be a fighter went to a gym and tried it out. Back then more of the fans knew the type of work it take to be in shape and throw punches for 3 minutes. It's not easy and not everyone can do it, but today most seem to think that they can. Not knowing the dedication and hard work it takes the be a professional make it easy for a Keyboard cowboy to call a fighter a bum.
    Another thing, back in the day if you walked up to a fighter and called him a bum you could find yourself waking up in the hospital. The fighter back then would get sued for everything he owned if he lit you up. Times have changed and so have the fan, and so has all of the people.
     
  11. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    195
    Oct 11, 2010
    People followed boxing by reading sports column in the morning paper so their opinions were well aligned with Dan Rafael's and Kevin Iole's of the time. Naturally, there was no trolling unless you wanted to start a bar fight. Boxing fans are much more engaged today thanks to abundance of information sources. Hell, you can even chat with Eddie Chambers on ESB. It is a brave new world.
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    Polite. The men all wore hats.
     
  13. ElTrigueno

    ElTrigueno Guest

    And no one tweeted and didn't overuse glass jaw phrase.
     
  14. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    One of those is true.
     
  15. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    46,352
    13,942
    Mar 5, 2006
    People listened over the radio.

    Its human fighting. That never gets old unless they wrestle on the ground