How would a prime Charles have fared against Marciano?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Mar 12, 2012.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,176
    Sep 15, 2009
  2. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    It makes Stonehands assertion more plausible than an ALS diagnosis.
     
  3. BillB

    BillB Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,757
    40
    Jul 23, 2011
    Marciano was greater than the sum of his parts.

    I believe he would have found a way to win, no matter who he was fighting- triumph of the will.
     
  4. louis3749

    louis3749 Member Full Member

    128
    0
    May 5, 2012
    At light heavyweight Charles probably has a better chance, but i don't see it being too much different from how the older, heavier Charles fared. Marciano would probably have a harder time at first catchng up to him, but the fights would probably turn out about the same.
     
  5. sugarkills

    sugarkills Active Member Full Member

    1,401
    16
    Sep 14, 2004
    If they fought at light heavy in their primes Charles could've won by UD or stoppage due to cuts.
     
  6. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,245
    2,441
    Mar 26, 2005
    We'll never know...will we?
     
  7. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,519
    1,675
    Aug 18, 2012
    They fought twice and Marciano won both times...once by ko. Odds would greatly favor Rocky no matter when they would have fought.
     
  8. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,672
    2,167
    Aug 26, 2004
    I think Charles became an excellent heavyweight but I also think when he entered the Marciano 1 fight, he was on a hot streak with 2 very impressive KO's over Wallace and Satterfield and he also brought into the ring vast experience at the age of 32, I dont think he looked as good vs Louis than in Marciano 1, I think the 2 Marciano fights took everything out of Charles....Its almost like saying who would be a better challenge the B-Hop that lost to Taylor 2X or the B-hop that beat Pavlik ...Charles was 32 and fit and experienced and on a hot streak, he may have gotten Ko'd earlier had he fought Marciano when he won the title....Marciano was just the greater fighter despite Charles great effort
     
  9. Joe E

    Joe E Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,361
    42
    May 12, 2007
    All things being the same, with Charles being a stand up Boxer puncher, who would stand and fight as opposed to covering up or moving when hurt, I think Marciano beats him at any point in his career.
     
  10. Danmann

    Danmann Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,427
    21
    Oct 30, 2011
    Marciano beats him and almost anyone else--maybe anyone else--anytime. Charles was considered in prime till after that second loss, he still had great fights, but the beating from those two fights took something out of him.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,176
    Sep 15, 2009
    I think he has a better chance but I still favour rocky.
     
  12. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,652
    2,541
    Nov 6, 2011
    Rocky finds a way to win Whether it be a KO in the 14th, 2 paid off judges or a very close UD, he always found a way.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,176
    Sep 15, 2009
    :good