How Would A Young Foreman Have Done In The 1990s?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, May 24, 2025 at 4:16 AM.


  1. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,470
    2,979
    Jan 6, 2024
    Research shows you can't win decisions if you always stop your opponent. Something you should know as a Wilder defender.

    At the end of his first career he was 0-1 with a close loss to Jimmy Young. Foremans strategy in the 90s at least against top opponents was to tire his opponents out and if there had been 15 rounders he'd have clearly benefitted from this not the other way around.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  2. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    25,258
    16,090
    Apr 3, 2012
    You've already DQ'd yourself from this thread with that wild ass post on the previous page that nobody even wants to respond to. Sorry, bud.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  3. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Delusional BUT Determined Full Member

    16,664
    18,558
    Sep 22, 2021
    Like I know everyone says "Oh but Rahman" fluke's withstanding but does anyone actually have a real plan for Foreman other then just run out and blitzkrieg Lennox? like that's not reliable, that's at best decent odds. I know he's better then Briggs but Briggs realised his chin was made of tougher stuff then we were lead to believe and got absolutely drummed by LL in retaliation lol if you took out the option to Satterfield I think we'd all agree it's more likely for LL to box him up and get a KO with the long range weapons.
     
  4. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Delusional BUT Determined Full Member

    16,664
    18,558
    Sep 22, 2021
    You think the Young fight was CLOSE?
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  5. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    25,258
    16,090
    Apr 3, 2012
    Close to God.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  6. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,091
    8,844
    Jul 15, 2008
    LOL .. funny.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  7. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,091
    8,844
    Jul 15, 2008
    I'd have to rewatch it ... I'm not sure it wasn't one of those fights that the momentum by the underdog and the drama may have overblown the scoring ... through the round where eGeorge had him badly hurt (7th?) it was I think very competitive but again have to rewatch it ..
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  8. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,470
    2,979
    Jan 6, 2024
    Foreman is not Briggs. The fact Briggs came closer to knocking out prime Lennox Lewis then 47 year old Foreman really says wonders too.
     
    Jakub79 likes this.
  9. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,470
    2,979
    Jan 6, 2024
    If not for the deduction Foreman would have drawn the Young fight if he'd won the last round and if he'd scored a 10-8 he'd have won the fight. Even with the deduction if Foreman had gotten a 10-8 in the last round it would have been a draw. Foreman just narrowly avoided scoring a knockdown earlier in the fight too.

    It was a close fight.
     
    Jakub79 likes this.
  10. Jakub79

    Jakub79 Active Member Full Member

    798
    878
    Mar 3, 2024
    I can't agree. Shulz had a great tactic for Foreman and he fought a Foreman who couldn't cut the ring like he did in the 70s. Legs make all the difference. Young George would have caught up with him, the old one was too slow, that's all. What other boxer could fight like that in reverse?
    Yes, George didn't get a decision after 12 rounds but he was close with Holyfield. Close enough to assume that a younger, faster Foreman would have gotten the decision and maybe even finished the pugnacious Evander. Bowe would have wanted to fight him too and that's always a bad idea.

    Foreman could have had a big problem with the prime Holmes, Tucker and Tubbs but in the 90s they were past their prime. He would have a problem with prime Vitali and Wlad but they got a chance after 2000. He would have a problem with someone like Byrd but he was also kept away. In my opinion Foreman wins everything from 1991 to 1999. He loses to Lewis. not because he is worse but because like Holyfield before he gets into this fight he will be already broken, worn out and burnt out by the wars with Bowe, Holy, Tyson, Moorer and will be past prime since 1997 and Lewis will stay away.
     
  11. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Delusional BUT Determined Full Member

    16,664
    18,558
    Sep 22, 2021
    Not really
     
  12. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Delusional BUT Determined Full Member

    16,664
    18,558
    Sep 22, 2021
    Well JY would have been robbed, he was drumming Foreman and dropped him in the final round lol I don’t know how you can watch that bout and think Foreman comes out looking good even on the inside JY was stunning him multiple times over across the fight, Foreman had moments but the fight was Uncle Jimmy’s.
     
  13. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,470
    2,979
    Jan 6, 2024
    The point was it was a close fight that Foreman had a chance to win up to the end. Not that Foreman won.

    People were questioning Foremans stamina and he fought one of the best skilled HWs ever to a standstill. Contrast this to how Lyle did against Jimmy Young. This fight was the foreshadowing of the point fighter late 90s Foreman became.
     
  14. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Delusional BUT Determined Full Member

    16,664
    18,558
    Sep 22, 2021
    One of the most skilled HW's ever? Now I know I can't debate this with you man, that's absolutely whacky and I am the Toney beats Foreman guy. Uncle Jimmy Young was a good contender but no great at all.
     
  15. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Delusional BUT Determined Full Member

    16,664
    18,558
    Sep 22, 2021
    @My dinner with Conteh you my friend are strangely absent from a thread where “Joltin” Jimmy Young has been called one of the most skilled HW’s ever.