How would Calzaghe do against previous and current champs?

All at 168?

 

9-0

 

Yes sir I do.

 

Not a bad spread, SJS. I'll need to give it some thought, but I think I'd have it mostly the same with the only ambiguity being the possible outcomes with Hearns. Hearns was not the same monster at 168 as his lower weights as you said, this is true. I can see him winning over Calzaghe, though.

 

He doesn't beat any of those fighters in their prime. Duran would be very small for him though so I'll put that one up as a pick em.

 

he would lose to all of them

 

considering the fact that he never faced anyone with a decent combination of power, speed, and actual BOXING skills such as lateral movement, he loses to everyone on that list. Unless he has a British ref who will stop the fight after he lands 3 arm punches.

If i can stop hating for a minute (though the above statement is absolutely true), it sucks the stupidity of his fans cripple his legacy. He was a good fighter with great matchmaking, good stamina, and a couple of lucky decisions. the fact that had he lost to Hopkins or Reid his legacy would be absolutely meaningless is evidence of how fragile it is.

 

Your breath absolutely stinks of *****.

 

Thomas Hearns - cal WKO
SRL - cal WUD
Hagler - Hagler by KO
James Toney - Toney Dec
RJJ - Too close to call - either jones by ud or cal by KO
Hopkins - Calzaghe close dec
Duran - Cal ud
Bute - Cal KO
Ward - Cal UD

ALL AT 168

 

Yes, hearns was a trashcan @ 168, was amazing 147/154.

 

Hearns was not a great fighter at 168.

 

Calzaghe vs

Thomas Hearns : Calzaghe lose this one
SRL: Timber! SRL way to fast and tricky
Hagler: No no no. Godnight mr Calzaghe
James Toney: Calzaghe wins this one
RJJ: In RJJ prime? Roy Jones dominates him and puts him away in 6 rounds
Hopkins: Close one, think Calzaghe wins
Duran: Calzaghe SD
Bute: Calzaghe wins
Ward: Calzaghe wins

In my opinion