How would calzaghe's resume look with sven ottke, had they fought

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by WhamBam, Feb 18, 2011.


  1. WhamBam

    WhamBam Keeping Cool Full Member

    2,134
    0
    Jul 30, 2010
    i dont rate ottke and think he was a bit of coward who spent a whole career hiding in germany, but if calzaghe had fought and beaten him (which he clearly would have) would this have had any impact on his resume as a fighter?
     
  2. NSFW

    NSFW ESB interacial lovin... Full Member

    3,795
    0
    Apr 30, 2010
    I think his record would have another dodgy european name on it and I doubt a win against Ottke would improve our apreciation for Calzaghe but at the time of the fight he would have got plaudits for the fight.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,238
    Sep 15, 2009
    Undoubtedly would make him the best smw of all time.

    He is very arguably the best anyway, but then he'd have beaten the best in his division and there is nothing more you could do as a fighter.

    In terms of frochs meteoric rise there is nothing joe could do. If froch carrier on as he is doing, and avenges kessler then it's gonna be hugely debatable as to who would have won prime for prime.

    So it would improve his legacy undoubtedly, however the very next era post joe is so competitive another heir to his throne is bound to arise and no amount of victories could change that fact.
     
  4. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,437
    3,528
    Dec 11, 2009
    It would have been a great win on Calzaghes resume but not as much as many would have you believe.
    Against common opponents Calzaghe tended to look the better.
    If they had of fought Calzaghe would have been a clear favourite even in Germany. People tended to think more of Lacy as a fighter and look how Lacy looked against Reid compared to Ottke. Lacy was a favourite to beat Calzaghe, Ottke wasnt.
    Calzaghe beating Lacy and Kessler to achieve those belts is far better than a win over Ottke where many question his victories
     
  5. TheUzi

    TheUzi MISSION INCOMPLETE Full Member

    7,358
    0
    Jul 23, 2008
    Not much of a difference for me...
     
  6. Beatboxer

    Beatboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,937
    2
    Mar 4, 2006
    Ottke was a ****, but let us be serious: he was a very good fighter in his prime. He achieved some good (legitmate believe it or not) wins and would've be a tough proposition for Calzaghe had they met.

    I believe Joe would've won and it would have to be regarded as his finest victory, behind the Hopkins and Kessler wins.

    Shame it never happened.
     
  7. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,064
    1
    Apr 30, 2007
    Calzaghe would have battered Ottke from pillar to post for 12 rounds and lost the split decision (if it was in Germany)
     
  8. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    Same here. Swap Otkke for one of the **** defences Calzaghe made and you have an obvious improvement from that point of view but a win over Otkke wouldn't elevate Calzaghes career much for me in the greater scheme of things.
     
  9. NO MAS

    NO MAS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,784
    1
    Mar 2, 2009
    Spot on...:good

    JC would have smoked his boots all night long...:deal
     
  10. WhamBam

    WhamBam Keeping Cool Full Member

    2,134
    0
    Jul 30, 2010
    calzaghe would have stopped ottke, ottke was an amateur fighter in the pro ranks he didn't have the slickness to beat joe, even if joe got robbed in germany it could have only enhanced his reputation and there would have been an immediate rematch ordered shame really
     
  11. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,275
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    They'd have found a way to job Calzaghe, one way or another. But as a clear robbery I doubt it would've hurt Joe's reputation much.
    No way in hell would Ottke have travelled to the UK.