How would Duran retiring after Montreal affect his standing?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, Jan 30, 2010.


  1. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,082
    12,999
    Jan 4, 2008
    With his win in Montreal Duran had amassed a simply astonishing career. Some 80 victories and only one defeat (avenged twice), a great LW reign and superb victories at WW over Palomino and Leonard. He could very well have an argument with the likes of Leonard, Greb, Armstrong etc for the absolute top places.

    After Montreal he had one magnificient moment in beating Barkley and performed one of the best losing efforts ever against Hagler. But he also lost in a pretty embarassingly manner against Leonard, Benitez and Hearns, and lost to lesser fighters such as Laing.

    So, what do you think? Did Duran's perfomances against Barkley and Hagler outweigh his low points, or would he have been rated even higher if he went out on a high note and retired after Montreal?
     
  2. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
  3. smitty_son408

    smitty_son408 J ust E njoy T his S hit Full Member

    6,030
    12
    May 3, 2008
    Because he survived it was one of the best losing efforts ever?? IMO Hagler dominated that fight and it wasn't remotely close to what the judges had scored. *thank God he clearly won the last two rounds*.

    But to answer your question, I believe he still would be a Top 10 ATG, the Leonard win was that huge.
     
  4. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,082
    12,999
    Jan 4, 2008
    I agree that Hagler won by a wide margin points wise, but Duran still made most rounds competitive. And considering that he was a 33-year old natural LW facing one of the best MWs ever, I think that says a lot. Don't think a 33-year old Hagler would fare that well against one of the best HWs ever, probably not even against one of the best LHWs ever. Just to put it into perspective.
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    It would probably be assumed he'd always beat Leonard and Leonards great later accomplishments boost him further. His weak lightweight competition would probably be made a bigger deal over as would the fact he only fought 2 top WWs

    Allot of Durans achievement is reliant on Leonards though. What if Leonard retired after Duran 2? Duran would be rated far lower
     
  6. smitty_son408

    smitty_son408 J ust E njoy T his S hit Full Member

    6,030
    12
    May 3, 2008

    I agree, but I honestly believed Hagler held back in that fight. He showed way too much respect for Duran.
     
  7. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    81
    Jul 9, 2008
    Buchanan, Dejesus x 3, Ernesto Marcel (granted below 135), Ray Lampkin, Hector Thompson, Viruet brothers, Mamby, etc. Weak???

    As for the question, I think his legacy would be about the same. Quitting against Leonard, and his no show performances cancel out the Barkley, Hagler, Moore, imo.
     
  8. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    Im not going to go into it but most consider it weak Dejesus/Buchanan aside
     
  9. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,666
    2,146
    Aug 26, 2004
    Well Duran did acomplish much after that fight Barkley,Moore, and showed his skill vs Hagler but the problem with Duran at that point in time was the party mode caught up with him and he could not retain the condition of Montreal. Duran was a giant in Panama and it got to him, like Tyson he was surrounded by sycophants and suffered from every vice from soda pop to Coke and had his choice of spanish woman....I think if he had retired at that pinacle at 71-1 it would have been a snapshot of perfection.
     
  10. Meast

    Meast New Member Full Member

    0
    13
    Dec 6, 2008
    A good question.

    If he retired after Montreal a lot of people would have criticised him for not giving Leonard a rematch, leaving lots of unanswered questions.

    Ironically, the rematch with Leonard is unfortunately what he's most remembered for with casual boxing fans and the public.

    I also think his LW competition would have been questioned, as mentioned above (although i don't myself considerate it to be that weak you could easily make an argument that it wasn't as strong as Benny's.

    Overall I think his ranking would have been about the same, although personally I'm glad he continued as his fights with Hagler, Barkley and Moore are some of the most enjoyable fight I've ever seen.
     
  11. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    46
    Sep 6, 2008
    I agree, but I think it was very, very close. Hagler was way too gun-shy.
     
  12. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    46
    Sep 6, 2008
    People seem to be quite happy making excuses for his losses. That said, he doesn't gain much extra currency for his weight-jumping antics in comparison to his longevity at 135 and the Leonard/Palomino wins, so taking that away might not make a massive difference. I think, overall, his H2H rating would have been about the same - people might not have taken so seriosuly the idea that he could be out-brawling a Barkley had it not happened, but they certainly wouldn't have picked him to lose to Benitez. (In a thread a while back, people seemed to think that a prime Duran would have beaten pretty much anybody at 147.) In terms of achievements, I think the Barkley, Moore and Hagler performances probably come close to balancing his embarassing moments. Making excuses really works.
     
  13. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    46
    Sep 6, 2008
    The real test would be how this comes out under a calculated comparison system (didn't Sweet Scientist have one of these?). Aesthetic considerations obviously determine the extent to which we prize weight-jumping over consistency etc.
     
  14. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    76
    Aug 26, 2004
    I know a lot of fans DO make excuses for Duran especially for the impossible to be sure what was going on behidn the scenes leonard rematch, but he seems to polarise opinions in the opposite manner as well.

    You aren't even allowed to say he was above his best weight and past his best for his losses post Leonard rematch anymore without being called to task on it.

    The cultured, educated observer who is a fan of the sport in general and not just certain fighters realises there is more truth than Carl Williams in those statements.
     
  15. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,368
    305
    Jan 8, 2009
    he is top 2 or 3 but the lost to leonard set the record straight that he should be outside top 5