let's not get carried away. juan diaz is a straight forward puncher. just like david diaz, the only difference between them is juan diaz has a better resume'.
If Pac DID fought Diaz. He won't get the credit like this one. Truth hurts but people will call out Campbell already exposed Diaz.
Juan has much better hand speed than David does and would have been able to deal with Pac's speed a little better imo.
but this is really unfair to jmm. jmm ko'ed juan diaz and not pacquiao. it's like people saying hatton would have ko'ed oscar faster than pac when he didn't even took the fight when it was offered to him.
I hear what your saying. I'm simply asking the question because I personally feel that Pac's style of fighting gives him an advantage over Diaz with his style. This analytical discussion obviously proves nothing it certainly isn't meant to take anything away from JMM's performance.
You speaking for yourself? "Same reason?" What "reason" is that? The suggestion, already, that Diaz and Hatton are the "same" must be there apparently. Yeah?
Quite simply put, Pac's movement would limit the effectiveness of Diaz's pressure thereby nullifying his greatest strength. Diaz wins his fights because he's able to out work his opponents and wear then down which wouldn't happen against Pac imo. Pac's power and handspeed would also terribly trouble Diaz, not to mention his south paw stance. Diaz also is no technition and to beat Pac at this weight, I believe one would have to make proper adjustments thoughout the coarse of the fight.