How would history view Norton and Frazier if they never beat Ali?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by NewChallenger, Jan 24, 2023.



  1. The Long Count

    The Long Count Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,704
    7,291
    Oct 8, 2013
    Frazier would still be in the hall of fame. And viewed as a great. Norton would not. Without Ali trilogy his career would look more like an alphabet champ of the 80s say a pinklon Thomas or Trevor Berbick type
     
  2. Rollin

    Rollin Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,897
    4,344
    Nov 17, 2021
    Norton tried to Frazier through Ali that night. His corner managed to get him to shake it off and use proven tactics. Futch said so, and I'm with him on this one.

    Polls are a number of anonymous votes. If you ask whether Canelo-Golovkin III was in 12-0/10-2 range, majority will likely say yes. As populum fallacy unless scorecards are actually posted with some degree of insight.

    IIRC I had Ali winning the first 3-4 rounds, Norton evening out, and then hectic last four rounds during which I could see somebody scoring for either man. I wouldn't raise an eyebrow if somebody scores the bout for Ali.
     
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,664
    10,471
    Jan 4, 2008
    It's hard to say. We know that he was good enough to beat a good amount of the contenders out there, but that others, like Shavers, would blow him out, so it depends a bit on the order he gets to face them in.
     
    Stevie G and Fergy like this.
  4. cuchulain

    cuchulain VIP Member Full Member

    33,477
    8,534
    Jan 6, 2007
    Nah, I have him in the seven to nine range.

    Without the FOTC, I'd drop him ten or so places.
     
  5. mirexxa

    mirexxa Heavyweight Champ Full Member

    993
    912
    Jan 21, 2022
    Disagree with the answers I think Joe would be remembered as yet another HW champion that got destroyed by a great fighter in Foreman. This has happened throughout history where not so good HW champion lost his title to a truly great fighter. Louis - Braddock, Willard - Dempsey, Patterson - Liston. That Ali win is his only claim to the ATG status tbh. You guys are way off on this one
     
  6. lone star

    lone star Active Member Full Member

    807
    943
    Mar 10, 2018
    As I see it. Can’t take away from Joe what he already achieved. But unfortunately for Ken he’d have no Ali controversial/close fights to fall back on. He’d have a hell of a job getting the big fights without the Ali connection.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  7. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 I’m become seeker of milk Full Member

    12,652
    13,342
    Sep 22, 2021
    The same losers who ogle over Cleveland Williams would attach themselves to Norton because of his appearance. Apart from that no one is talking about Kenny- who did he really beat in the top ten anyways? Besides Ali. Shot Quarry? Frazier would have to be a different fighter- he pretty much always beats Ali when they’re both on point.
     
    greynotsoold likes this.
  8. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,190
    2,743
    Mar 31, 2021
    Yes.
     
  9. lone star

    lone star Active Member Full Member

    807
    943
    Mar 10, 2018
    Does anyone else here think he was slightly out of place in the film Champions Forever?
     
  10. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,310
    6,694
    Jul 17, 2009
    I thought Ken earned his slot in that film. Beating Ali once qualifies him.
     
    Pugguy likes this.
  11. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,011
    15,324
    Jul 30, 2014
    Do you also agree with Futch that Norton wouldn't have beaten even a '70-'71 Ali?

    "Would Norton beat the Ali of, say three years?"

    "Definitely not." Futch said.

    Source: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/72689280/albuquerque-journal/

    On his site at least, thread starters are given the option to publicly reveal participants in a poll, which I chose to do. So you're incorrect this vote wasn't anonymous. As a matter of fact, despite Ali receiving nearly triple the votes as is, many who voted for Norton, commented in the thread, they only did so because they thought my thread was referring to their third fight.
     
  12. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,011
    15,324
    Jul 30, 2014
    Frazier, the unified champ would fall into this bunch? Really?
     
  13. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,190
    2,743
    Mar 31, 2021
    Unified against whom ?!?
    He had no huge ATG wins before facing Ali.
    Similar to Norton, his status was elevated simply due to him beating Ali.
     
  14. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,011
    15,324
    Jul 30, 2014
    Regardless the fact that he was the champion automatically puts him higher than Norton, Lyle, etc. No ands, if, or buts.
     
  15. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,078
    5,694
    Aug 17, 2011
    The only thing special about Frazier was his willingness. There was nothing special about Norton.
    The defining thing about them was their part in the circular logic that is the Ali mystique: They are great fighters because they gave Ali hard fights and Ali is great because he beat them.
    On their own merits, there is absolutely zero to distinguish either Norton or Frazier as great fighters. Everything about them has to be qualified through Ali, just as his merits are qualified through them.
    You can throw Foreman into the mix as well because he is a huge part of the propaganda. There was nothing but hype about his first career and, for perspective, he was dropped by Jimmy Young. And Young is great because of...Ali.
    None of those guys were any better than good.
     
    cross_trainer, Pat M and White Bomber like this.