How would Lewis do against Marciano's title opposition ?

Not that I care but isnt that a little rough? afterall this is a forum where we express our own oppinions. Just because mine differ from yours shouldnt cause that kind of reaction. BTW your the same guy that laughed at me when I had Holmes top 3. Then you posted a few weeks back that you never realized how good he was.

 

old robby ungurean with his humpty dumpty ass shaped head

 

Joe louis would be the toughest fight, but he beats the other 48 comfortably.

 

My first instinct is to pick Lewis over all of them, but we never did see how Lewis would do against really skilled boxers since the Byrd fight never happened (also southpaws, but that doesn't come into play here). Lennox rose to the top in an era of sluggers, but I think his pure skill gets overrated because of that.

Considering that and Lennox coming in unfocused from time to time, Walcott may be able to pull off the upset...but I would call it an upset, as Lennox would still be the favorite for me.

 

Lewis would stop Walcott by controlling the pace and distance, fighting his typical chess match approach and unloading on the much smaller man when the time was right. All the nifty side steps and traps wouldn't work on a man so much taller and longer who himself was cautious and disciplined in his approach.

 

I have no idea what your talking about forum tough guy.

 

Errr there goes the train off the tracks. This all really depends on which Lewis we're talking about.