How Would Marvin Hagler Do @ Light Heavyweight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bad_Intentions, Jul 11, 2007.



  1. Bad_Intentions

    Bad_Intentions Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,367
    29
    May 15, 2007
  2. la-califa

    la-califa Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,292
    44
    Jun 12, 2007
    In the era he fought? I seem to remember the Division was pretty weak at that time, Virgil Hill, Don LaLonde? Please...
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,262
    35,055
    Apr 27, 2005
    Actually it's more like Spinks, Saad, Mustafa Muhammad and Braxton/Qawi. Goodnight Irene.
     
  4. Bad_Intentions

    Bad_Intentions Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,367
    29
    May 15, 2007
  5. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,996
    2,095
    Oct 18, 2004
    Again, not good, especially against Spinks.
     
  6. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,006
    973
    Sep 13, 2006
    The guys that were around during Hagler's time were simply too big, too strong, too talented, and weight would tell. I'm not saying he'd have no chance, because Hagler was a very good fighter, but guys like Matt Saad Muhammad, Qawi, and Spinks were really tough, strong, and fast, and naturally big and durable guys.
     
  7. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    251
    Apr 18, 2007
    Mutual sparring partners of both Hagler and Saad Muhammad claimed that Marv was a harder puncher than Matt. (I have also read the same allegations about Hagler and Marvin Johnson, but that strains credulity slightly. As Matt was really an arm puncher, I could buy Hagler as a harder hitter than him.)

    Hagler would have had to be much more of a cutie at LH, moving laterally to obtain the proper punching angle for his right jab, and he would probably need to forego the switch hitting he so frequently employed as a MW. (Unless he was a better defensive fighter as a righty, the way Czyz was as a southpaw.) He certainly had the chin to withstand the force delivered by the top LH's of his era. He demonstrated against Hamsho, Minter, and in the Antuofermo rematch, that superior physical strength offered no particularly useful advantage against Hagler. His boxing prowess was more than sufficient to neutralize physically stronger opposition.

    I don't think Marvin Johnson would have survived to the final bell against Hagler. His endurance was fine against relatively passive adversaries, but crumbled under significant resistance and toughness. Hagler would hustle him and wear him down. Southpaw Johnson would have been open to Hagler's right jab and hook. Johnson's left cross wouldn't have quite as easy a target in Hagler, and when Johnson did land with it, Hagler could take it.

    Saad Muhammad's singular approach to dealing with southpaws was to glue his hook to their bodies. His title defense against Louis Pergaud in Halifax, Nova Scotia, was an exemplary illustration of Matt's philosophy about dealing with lefties. He would have forced Hagler to hold his power arm in check for defending against Matt's hook.

    Eddie Mustapha Muhammad would be an interesting case. With his temperament in the ring, he might sleepwalk his way to a decision loss. (Did Easy Eddie ever hustle his way to a decision win?) Like Matt, Eddie would likely forgo Hagler's granite chin to go downstairs.

    Dwight Qawi would be more of a chess match and contest for positioning than most might suspect. Ike had the very best counterjab of his era, while Hagler had the hardest right jab of all time. No knockdowns, no stoppage. It will come down to ring generalship. If Hagler can circle right, to the outside of Qawi's jab, and come at Ike with hooks and jabs to the body, and lead lefts from behind Qawi (keeping one step ahead), then Dwight could be in for a frustrating experience. Ike's elegant approach was simply to keep his lead foot between his opponent's feet (splitting his defense and cutting off the ring), then reflexively triggering his own jab when his opponent jabbed. (A peak Qawi would have given Ali a lot more trouble than anyone might suspect.)

    Hagler's being a great jabbing southpaw would pose a different set of issues for Ike. In this dance, Marv would need to continually circle right, keeping his left foot outside Qawi's lead foot, as he steps his right behind Dwight, getting Ike to continually turn left to try facing Marv. Every so often, Hagler would want to take a big right step to the outside of Qawi's left, and try splitting his defense with a hard left cross inside Ike's jab and down the pike. Qawi had a nasty habit of breathing through his mouth. (It made him look as if he was constantly sneering at his prey.) That he never had his jaw broken is testimony to what a fine defensive fighter Ike was. But if Hagler can nail his opened jaw solidly from his unorthodox posture, he might do more damage than one might expect of a typical middleweight.

    I don't think the 170 pound Mike Spinks of the David Sears fight would have had the picnic with Marv that everybody supposes, at least not in terms of punching him out easily. As smart as Mike and Futch were, they would have more likely utilized Mike's superb boxing skills and mobility to assert their will on Marv. I would expect them to take a page out of Marcos Geraldo's playbook, and employ leftward lateral movement while constantly splashing his jab into Hagler's face. By the time Mike's legs were fatigued to the point where he should settle down more, he ought to have a significant lead piled up on the scorecards. Once Marv catches Mike, he'd find he doesn't have anything in his arsenal like what would be needed to stop Spinks. Mike would still have the strength and firepower necessary to keep Hagler at bay, and win a very clear cut and clever decision.

    Former middleweights like Mickey Walker and James Toney have displayed fine chins of heavyweight caliber when their mettle has been tested. Tommy Hearns sustained stoppage losses at WW and MW, yet proved to be a perfectly competent championship caliber LH. Iran Barkley was also kayoed at MW by Hagler's half brother Robbie Sims, yet went on to retire murderous punching former WBA HW Champion Gerrie Coetzee by kayo.

    Unlike Hearns, Walker, and Barkley, the measure of Hagler's ability to withstand a heavy punch was never taken. I will not assume that he would have been slaughtered by the top light heavyweights of his era, simply because he had the discipline and dedication to maintain the same weight and a high level of fitness throughout his career. Unlike James Toney, nobody ever punched Hagler to the deck at middleweight, or even come close. I will not presume to penalize Hagler for his superior consistency, and refusal to play weight division hopscotch. He did the right thing in keeping his size steady, and upholding the great tradition of outstanding middleweight champions, one that he carried forward from Monzon, and that Hopkins advanced from Hagler. (Haven't you ever wondered how long and well RJJ and Toney would have performed with the discipline and consistency of a Hagler or B-Hop?)
     
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,262
    35,055
    Apr 27, 2005
    This was the one. I might be wrong, but i always thought of Saad as a superb puncher, borne out by his very very high ranking in the Ring's Top 100 Punchers. He was near always ranked in the top 3 punchers at 175 with Spinks and EMM. If Saad is a mere arm puncher i'd hate to see a serious one. While not possessing many 1 punch ko's, Saad was still a very very big puncher.
     
  9. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    330
    Jan 29, 2005
    I believe Marvin would do well if he could maintain the same movement at 160. Marvin did exceptionally well against taller opponents because of the ease with which he was able to slip under punches.

    The matchup he might do well to avoid is against Qawi who was actually shorter than Marv. But who knows? The version who showed with Spinks might also show up against Marv. If not, Marvin could be in for a long night.

    A match with Spinks could also be in Marvin's favor. Anyone who would confuse Hagler with Mustafa Wassaja must not be taken seriously and should leave the forum.

    Micheal actually had a lead foot in the ring which is to say his mobility was average compared when with Marvin's. when you look at how a half blind, weight drained EMM held his own and how a battle fatigued 34 year old Eddie Davis came so close to getting the decision (on my card) I'd say Marvin's chances look pretty good.

    I actually favor Hagler by a shade vs. Donny Lalonde even though I know he was most likely shot by then. He might stand a better chance with Donny rather than with Collins at middleweight because of the inexperience. Hagler by close decision
     
  10. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    251
    Apr 18, 2007
    Oh, don't get me wrong, JT, Saad was an awesome puncher, but if he was a master of leverage, he would have been filling cemeteries (like Foreman would have, if he'd been a leverage puncher).

    Hagler was also really more of a lethal arm puncher as well, but what made his attack so devastating is that one of his power punches was his right jab. (Stylewise, Marv was the closest thing I've seen to a southpaw Liston.)

    Duran, Cuevas, SRL, Mike Spinks, and Eddie Mustafa Muhammad are who I generally consider to be some of the classic leverage punchers from that era.

    As deady as Mike Spinks and Eddie Mustafa Muhammad could be when they loaded up, their arm muscles were not extraordinarily developed. Saad could have been a competitive bodybuilder with the physique he had, and part of the reason his arms were so muscular was because that's were much of the incredible power of his punches was generated from (rather than his core).
     
  11. Hitman

    Hitman Member Full Member

    248
    3
    Aug 22, 2006
    Agreed!