How would Pacquiao do against Floyd?

He'd beat floyd counting the ring lights

On his back !!!

 

There is no such thing as less risk, higher reward. That is a fans mentality. That is how a fan thinks when he doesn't fully understand boxing economics. Floyd would beat the tar out of both Pac and AM. Floyd would choose either fighter that was a big draw, and who he could make the most money with. Fans who never fought utter such nonsense as "less risk, higher reward". What was your record?:rofl lol 0-0

 

I dislike Floyd, but admit...Maybe he does beat AM, or Pac. You know what though? Doesnt' matter because he has NO BALLS! I don't care if your the most talented, hard hitting, quickest MOFO in the sport of boxing. If you duck opponents, and he retired at what? 32 or 33? Barely apast his prime...OBViOUSLY he ducked people then. You will not go down as an the greatest of all time because you didn't prove it!
The man walks out of boxing saying pretty much saying he beat everybody. Meanwhile you had Cotto who never lost, AM which PBF promised him a match at any rate, he didn't even fight his rematch with De la hoya to my surprise (though I don't care).
Just don't skip around weight divisions picking champions you know you could easily beat (Baldomir anyone?), and then retire when there's fighters who not only could beat you, and you'd even earn a good payday, saying you beat EVERYONE!
****, Cotto hasn't been in the game near as long as Floyd and probably not going to retire anytime soon, and I'd say his resume is just as good as Floyd. Also, he fought AM, got the **** knocked out of him, and has enough *courage* to come back, and try to avenge his loss.

 

I dislike Floyd, but admit...Maybe he does beat AM, or Pac. You know what though? Doesnt' matter because he has NO BALLS! I don't care if your the most talented, hard hitting, quickest MOFO in the sport of boxing. If you duck opponents, and he retired at what? 32 or 33? Barely apast his prime...OBViOUSLY he ducked people then. You will not go down as an the greatest of all time because you didn't prove it!
The man walks out of boxing saying pretty much saying he beat everybody. Meanwhile you had Cotto who never lost, AM which PBF promised him a match at any rate, he didn't even fight his rematch with De la hoya to my surprise (though I don't care).
Just don't skip around weight divisions picking champions you know you could easily beat (Baldomir anyone?), and then retire when there's fighters who not only could beat you, and you'd even earn a good payday, saying you beat EVERYONE!
****, Cotto hasn't been in the game near as long as Floyd and probably not going to retire anytime soon, and I'd say his resume is just as good as Floyd. Also, he fought AM, got the **** knocked out of him, and has enough *courage* to come back, and try to avenge his loss.

This content is protected

[url]

This content is protected

[/url] [url]Top[/url]
Yeah your a idiot. Cotto's resume is no where near PBF. That has to be the dumbest thing I have ever read on here. How many weight classes does Cotto have titles in again. You should never post on here again and find a way to kick yourself in the nuts.

 

Floyd Would walk rings around pacquiao all fight and will be potshotting his way to a wide ud...easy fight for pbf

 

I think Floyd wins by ko

 

LOL. mayweather fanboy-ism here is still alive.

 

Bad match up for Pac. Mayweather's overall hand and foot speed is something that Pac has not even come close to seeing in any of his previous opponents. His best hope against Mayweather is to land a lucky straight left with full power behind it and maybe get a stoppage; otherwise Floyd gets a easy 12 UD.

 

pbf all day in this match up. pac struggled against marquez twice, what will he do against pbf? lol

 

Floyd would most likely win this. Unless Pac beats DLH and have more improvements in his game, I really don't see him beating the Pretty Boy.

 

Pac doesnt have a chance in hell.

 

The best way to guage is to see how pac fights dlh. if dlh TOYS with Pac then you can say what you said is accurate.. if it's the other way around then it's a different story all together...

meantime, sitback relax and enjoy the fight on dec

 

More power? Perhaps. What good is power if you cannot land a clean solid punch?! atsch

Quicker? Have you even seen a Mayweather fight because I don't think you have.

You point out these so called 'advantages' but tell me something.
How does Pacman compensate for Mayweathers counter shots, footwork, ring generalship, intelligence and defence?

Think real hard about it.

 

And have you seen Pac's fights as well? If you have noticed the improvements he's had till the Diaz fight, it is not impossible for him to be a much more complete fighter when he meets PBF, which is after he fights Oscar and even Ricky.

He fought as a one dimensional fighter against MAB but managed to look great, he adjusted to the counter punching of JMM and did much better at their second meet. He exhibited much improvement when he demolished Diaz in a way not so many lightweights can do.

We haven't seen his downfall yet and might even be surprised again when he fights Oscar. I mean how can you say Pac is a walk in the park for Floyd if we haven't seen the best of him yet?

 

We'll know a little more on that topic after Dec 6.



And If Pac pulls off the huge upset (which he probably won't), he'll face Floyd next year.


Look for Floyd to make his comeback against the winner of DLH-Pac, in the first half of 09.


And remember, you read it here first.