how would you rank these fighters?

1.Oscar
2.Tito
3.Shane

 

Shane
Oscar
Tito

 

It almost as hard as ranking Hagler/Leonard/Hearns/Duran

 

Its probably so close that it might even come down to the fighters you root for or stylistically prefer.

Cheers!

Go Chad!

 

To me is:
1. Tito (he beat Oscar)
2. Shane (he beat Oscar twice)
3. Oscar

I would've love to see Shane vs Tito but it never happened. I basically rank Tito above Oscar all the way because to me Tito never ducked anyone. He always wanted to fight the best no matter how risky it was.

 

I agree... there's really no wrong answer... :good

 

I think Tito would definitely have beaten Shane, that's a bad bad stylistic match for SSM.

 

This is gonna sound really dumb, but to me it makes sense. Although Oscar lost to both, I still rank him higher head to head. I think out of the three Oscar, in his prime, was the hardest to beat. Shane beat him fare and square which is why I rate that accomplishment so high. Tito got the "w", but he certainly did not "beat" him. Lets put it this way; If you take 5 fighters of different styles and make each one fight all three, I think Oscar would fare the best.

 

A bad stylistic matchup for Shane is someone with a punishing jab and size advantage.

Tito didnt really have that.

Shane/Tito/Oscar are always going to be close fights.

 

Shane and Oscar split a win each in reality, DLH clearly beat Shane in the 2nd fight. He beat Tito too. But SMM won the 1st DLH clash brilliantly.

Like the Pac/MAB/Morales/JMM conundrum, this is a difficult question.