How would you rate Holyfield?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mr. magoo, Jun 12, 2009.


  1. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    13,314
    20,822
    Jul 2, 2006
    what do people think of his steriod use? Does it affect ur ranking of him?
     
  2. kmcc505

    kmcc505 Sweet Scientist Full Member

    884
    8
    Apr 20, 2008
    Easily top ten. I find it strange you are so sure he used steroids based on one report and nothing else.
     
  3. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    13,314
    20,822
    Jul 2, 2006
    i am not saying i am sure, i am just curious if he did use them would his ranking be affected in most peoples eyes?
     
  4. vorapsak2002

    vorapsak2002 Active Member Full Member

    1,196
    1
    Apr 14, 2009
  5. Brummy1976

    Brummy1976 Guest

    I'm surprised u dont think he used steroids.Hes got to be the most blatant case ever after the first bowe encounter maybe before.His shoulders looked huge
     
  6. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005
    For me it doesn't. The reason for that is because it's a grey area. While i don't doubt he was on roids, he never proved positive during any of his bouts during his prime. So, judging him based merely on "he likely did it" is unfair in my opinion, especially when it's very well possible that his opponents used them as well.

    Would Frans Botha, James Toney or Tommy Morrison have been labled "steroid users for sure" the way Holyfield has been, if they had never been caught? I don't think so.... and that means that for all we know, the entire heavyweight division from the 70's up to today may have been on them.

    The bottomline is: we can't be sure who used and who didn't. I don't think it's fair to single out Holyfield while the likes of Tyson, Lewis, Bowe, etc, may just as well have used them.

    And to extend that point..... if they're ALL on it, is it still cheating? Since you hold no advantage over your opponents i don't think it is - in an all-time ranking sense that is - it's still against the rules and as such, cheating. But then again, the rules never caught them, so it's not cheating. ... I love having monologues.
     
  7. Arka

    Arka New Member Full Member

    0
    7
    Sep 26, 2008
    No. :D (edit: this ranking of greats is a silly business anyway)

    It is remarkable,though,how a cruiserweight became a legitimate heavyweight,late in his career isn't it ?
     
  8. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,581
    Dec 18, 2004
    Somewhere between 8-12. I think the fact that he was never dominant goes against him a bit. He suited the underdog tag more at the top heavyweight level.