How Would You Rate Naseem in his Prime?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by h2hkiller, Dec 23, 2007.


  1. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Fair enough

    No way was Hamed at his peak in that fight though. I watched the lad for years, and just about everything had diminished. His comeback fight just about summed it up. Rather than being because of his loss against MAB, it was rather a continuation of the downward curve

    Sad
     
  2. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    8/10. Naz had great power, speed and reflexes. He was just a lazy little ****.
     
  3. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,064
    1
    Apr 30, 2007
    Spot on.

    The split from Ingle was the beginning of the end.
     
  4. angelos

    angelos Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,623
    1
    Dec 8, 2007
    Average fighter.
     
  5. john b

    john b EVERTON 0- OLdham 1 Full Member

    6,354
    0
    Jul 6, 2007
    :good
     
  6. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    How do you explain Pacquiao then??
     
  7. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    I agree Hamed was crap. **** him. Sugar Ray Leonard was better.
     
  8. JamRos

    JamRos Marvelous Full Member

    58
    0
    Nov 18, 2006
  9. rreed23

    rreed23 aka Gordon Gekko Full Member

    1,874
    0
    Nov 23, 2007
    Naz was a great fighter, one of the most entertaining to watch ever
     
  10. retriever

    retriever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,057
    29
    Jan 20, 2006
    5 could have been 7... he has no heart though.
     
  11. raiderjay

    raiderjay Active Member Full Member

    742
    0
    Jan 7, 2007
    To me Pac is not near as unorthodox as Hamed or Vic. He doesn't do the weird tactic of bending at the knees and almost having his ass on the ground like those two. Pac actually uses a jab to set up the straight left. He also has developed as a fighter in the last 4 years or so, by actually using some head movement and also looking to counter as opposed to always pressuring. Hamed and Vic also just looked for the one big shot, where as Pac uses applied pressure and punches in bunches, and then once he has worn down an opponent, goes for the huge KO power shots.
     
  12. "TKO"

    "TKO" Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,386
    806
    Jun 23, 2007
    Firstly, in answer to whoever asked, I am not aware of anywhere you can watch the documentary online, maybe try youtube or somewhere like that for clips?

    Secondly, as stated, the question was indeed how would you rate Nas in his prime? Which, to me, was around the 1995-1997 period. Comparisons to Vic Darchinyan are the most pointless thing I've seen, when did Darchinyan ever beat 10 world champions? I rated Hamed extremely highly around that point. He seemed to lose it all very quickly, mainly due to his own laxness, and was past it at a very early age. That and the fact that he never tried to come back and avenge his one loss (which was an 8-4 kind of points decision, hardly a Hopkins-Trinidad, Forrest-Mosley, Wright-Trinidad, Lewis-Holyfield, Mayweather-Corrales style one sided butt kicking) prevents him achieving greatness in my eyes. Nonetheless, its silly to deny that at his peak he was a hell of a fighter.
     
  13. Motor City Sam

    Motor City Sam Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,102
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    That "no heart" line is a little harsh, don't you think? I saw Hamed get dropped in fights and then get up to KO his opponent.