How would you see Khan -Bailey going down if he makes an optional defence?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Euro Bum, Jun 10, 2012.


Page 2 of 2
  1. Dunky McCafferty

    Dunky McCafferty Boxing Junkie banned

    10,067
    2
    Aug 24, 2004
    Brook doesnt even deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as Khan mr Bowen.

    Its a fight I would love to see though, as I would love to see Amir put that SKY hypejob away in style:smoke
     
    Dunky McCafferty, Jun 10, 2012
    Dunky McCafferty, Jun 10, 2012
    #16
  2. Jim Bowen

    Jim Bowen MARVELOUS Full Member

    5,162
    0
    Aug 5, 2011
    Possibly true, but I thought the winner of Jones-Brook was meant to become mandatory for Bailey? If Khan fought bailey first, wouldn't that make Brook mandatory for the winner of that (most likely Khan)?
     
    Jim Bowen, Jun 10, 2012
    Jim Bowen, Jun 10, 2012
    #17
  3. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
    [ame]http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oKtfUtQwFi8[/ame]
     
    Primadonna Kool, Jun 10, 2012
    Primadonna Kool, Jun 10, 2012
    #18
  4. Coldhearted

    Coldhearted Active Member Full Member

    1,009
    0
    May 17, 2010
    Khan could beat Bailey, Malignaggi or Bradley in my opinion so he has plenty to choose from at 147 as it stands. Doubt the Bradley fight will get made because of Arum the snake.
     
    Coldhearted, Jun 11, 2012
    Coldhearted, Jun 11, 2012
    #19
Page 2 of 2