How you rate the boxing belts right now? For me the WBO ironically is the most credible, but the wbc is the more with prestidge. right now for me is: wbo wbc wba ibf ring magazine is so bias this days that i stop thinking about how special it was at some moment
They are all pretty bad, RING for me is most credible since its toughest to get WBO appears to have the least stocking stuffer champs like the Silver, Super, Interim, Regular bull crap that goes around Didnt the WBC initially fracture the belts in 2, did Suliman create the split that we have today and the WBA was really the first belt or is my history wrong
Any sentence involving alphabet boxing belts and "credibility" is an oxymoron. The belts have virtually no intrinsic value. The prestige is in the fighters you beat, not the trinket that comes with it. The Ring championship concept was a breath of (relatively) fresh air when it was relaunched, but has been watered down by policy changes and vested interests.