How's that US writers always find a way to cover up such a disgrace?

Sounds like the bias is actually coming from your direction pal. I'm white as can be, farmer's tan and all. But let me ask you this: WHAT THE **** DOES MY SKIN HAVE TO DO WITH THIS FIGHT?

You sir are a big dumbass.

Don't get me wrong, its ok to disagree with one another on here, thats why the forums exist. But how do you go from the score of a fight to the color of my skin? Classic tardness.

 

Over the past 18 months, the US has shown itself to be the home of the robbery. Even Germans will be hanging their heads in shame at the robberies that have taken place in the US in recent times.

 

OMG.

Ok first: King Crimson kicks ass, Robert Fripp is my hero. Just based on the fact that you apparently like that band makes me want to back down from you out of pure respect, since you clearly have impeccable musical taste.

Second: Shut the **** up. I've got plenty of education. I know what I'm talking about when it comes to boxing. Not saying you are wrong if you think Kotelnik won the fight or whatever.. but I don't get all the outrage, I just don't.

 

Ever think people on here are wrong?

 

American writers are biased towards American boxers, what's wrong with that, Bigbone? I think it's even much worse in Germany or Russia. People who think that the media is not manipulating are very naive or just simply stupid.

 

I think you mean 100% of outraged europeans rushing to ESB after the fight looking for a poll to vote on.

But OK I see your point.

 

Typical overreaction.

This was a fight that could have been scored 7-5 rounds in favor of either fighter.

 

I haven't read through all the posts, but if you are saying 80% of ESB had Kotelinik winning by a wide margin, then all I can tell you is that 80% of ESB has an agenda, don't know much about boxing, aren't qualified to judge fights, but most importantly are wrong. I mean no disrespect but to say Kotelinik won that fight period, is obviously no accurate, but to take it to the extreme of won by a large margin is blatantly wrong. I mean he got out hussled, he didn't drop the kid, he was eating plenty of punches himself, and while I agree he had some of the better individual moments over the course of 12 rounds no way he won that fight, and certainly he didn't win it wide. I mean seriously, all three judges and Lederman had him winning comfortably. I mean Kotelinik had 3 really good rounds, no doubt about it, within those rounds he dished out the most significant punishment of the fight. But the other 9 rounds he plodded around throwing a couple of counter shots here and there and allowed himself to get out worked. It's like Hopkins-Taylor, it's not Alexanders fault that Kotelinik allowed his opponent to outwork him, had he picked up the pace maybe things would have been different, had he come out working like he did in the late mid and late rounds, maybe he gets the win, but he didn't. Bottom line, Kotelinik allowed himself to lose that fight by not being busy enough, not working hard enough, and allowing the heart and "want to" of his opponent to win out, point blank.

 

Every country writers try to cover up bad decisions. Nothing new.

Don King + hometown fighters = opponent needs a knockout and that goes for both fights last night.

 

I knew you would be in here to take the "white side" of things.

Juicebox never said anything except that he thought Alexander won a fight where Kotelnik impressed him.


And "streets" brought race into it... as you always do.

 

atsch

 

it was a closed good figth no real loosers

 

At least you don't find bodyslams, arm bars, superplex off the turnbuckle and chokeslams like they're allowed for local fighters in England.