huge dishonesty by ward fans

this fight for me brought to light how 10 10 rounds should and should have been in use for more frequent and in far more fights
like the Floyd maidana one fight for instance oops
or the groves degale fight they all then could be very different outcomes

 

I concur with you
but I am informed to think like this makes me ignorant lol
only on esb

 

huge complains & crying by Kovalev fans

 

Earn the title?
What the **** does that mean? The champion has a handicap?

 

another way to put it leave no doubt which aint the case

 

So you think discussing a fight is best served by hyperbole rather than with honesty? I think it was a close fight which could have been called for either boxer. But if it makes you feel any better, I'll put it this way: Ward won it easy, it was a one-sided beat down! There, I've replaced intelligent debate with the hubris of the schoolyard. So we talk on a level now.

By the way, you know how fights are scored, right? Boxing on the back foot? Doesn't count against. Throwing fewer isn't always decisive. Ditto, landing fewer, when the stats were close - which they were.

Ward won the fight. Get over it. You say Ward fans destroy their reputation post-fight, but the level of butthurt you display in the yours, weeks after the event, just makes the result all the more enjoyable. Keep it up!

 

The funny thing with those who say the challenger has to earn the title, is they are actually asking the judges to watch the fight from a biased perspective, to favour one fighter over another and not based on what they see in the ring. That's the very thing they accuse the judges of being when they gave the decision to Ward. lol

 

Still, even that makes no sense. So whenever a fight is really close, the champion keeps the belts?

 

Kovalev has 3 belts for a reason. Hes just that good. How is it reasonable to state that someone has to basically outclass him. Hes the champ, logic states that he won´t be an easy foe.

 

seen it happen over the years many many times
and pros have told me the same thing you have to beat a champion decisively

 

Still, it´s a handicap for the supposed champion. How does that make any sense?
It´s just a stupid old saying.

 

This is stupid. You Ward dictators keep talking about corruption but the very thought of the challenger having to do more than just enough to win is corruption itself.