Humour me. Roberto Duran vs Stanley Ketchel 15 rounds

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Journeyman92, Nov 3, 2022.


Who is it who wins?

  1. Stan

    31.3%
  2. Duran

    65.6%
  3. Draw

    3.1%
  1. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 MONZON VS HAGLER 2025 banned Full Member

    19,057
    21,097
    Sep 22, 2021
    Roberto Duran whatever version you want. Prime Ketchel. 20 rounds, old rules. have at it.
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2022
    Jel, Unnecessarily Hostile and Fergy like this.
  2. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,131
    8,585
    Jul 17, 2009
    Providing it's the best middleweight version of Duran (1983) I see him outboxing Ketchel over 15. Roberto had the caginess and skill to negate Stanley's charges and ferocious punches.
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2022
    White Bomber and Fergy like this.
  3. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,261
    15,325
    Jun 9, 2007
    I honestly think Duran would have made a fool out of him and knocked him out. I'm not denying Ketchel was a hard ### I just don't think he would be able to defend against Duran hence the KO
     
    ETM, Seamus, louis54 and 3 others like this.
  4. Tockah

    Tockah Ingo's Bingo Full Member

    904
    1,388
    Mar 12, 2022
    I'd bet the Duran who fought Barkley would defeat Ketchel. Nevertheless a prime Duran.
     
    White Bomber, louis54 and Guru88 like this.
  5. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,978
    19,019
    Oct 4, 2016
    I'm a big Duran fan but I'm not certain about this one, I think Duran would easily outbox Ketchel and counter him with solid right hands and his defense would frustrate Stanley. The thing that gnaws at me is Ketchel's strength and power, with a lot of grappling , mauling and holding in a fast paced 15 round fight does Roberto wane in the later rounds? If Duran's power shots can do some damage to Ketchel in the first 10 rounds I think he'd manage a decision, but I just don't know if Duran could seriously hurt Ketchel , Duran could slow up as he did when he got tired against Hagler. And I think this would be a significantly more physical fight than he had with Hagler. There are a lot of historically good middleweights I think Duran could beat and I'd lean with the Manos De Piedra by decision in this one but with no confidence and I wouldn't bet on it.
     
  6. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,978
    19,019
    Oct 4, 2016

    Well that's the problem, there's no such thing as a prime middleweight Duran
     
  7. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,832
    13,125
    Oct 20, 2017
    If boxing truly evolved between the early 1900s and the following decades, you’d be hard pressed to find a better test case than this fight.

    Yes, Duran could be fat and sloppy and he could be outboxed when he wasn’t on his game (and maybe when he was on his game too, but let’s leave that one aside) but I don’t think Ketchel has the style to trouble Duran in the ways that even a guy like Kirkland Laing did. Of course, Ketchel is greater than Kirkland Laing but there’s nothing in Ketchel that makes me think he would catch Duran out.

    Physically, he would have the edge in power and possibly strength, but Duran was so good inside and would be comfortable in a clinch that I don’t see that physicality troubling him.

    I think he’d use his smarts to outbox and outfox Ketchel and take a hard-fought decision.
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2022
  8. Boxing GOAT

    Boxing GOAT Active Member Full Member

    765
    1,155
    Apr 2, 2020
    I never understood the hype around Ketchel, other than his popularity for fighting Johnson, knocking him down and then getting KO'd. He had a few good wins versus Papke and O'Brien and Papke wasn't exactly a great fighter. Ketchel was a crude brawler who clinched excessively. Duran would have outclassed him in every way imaginable. I see an early round KO, with Duran's hands raised as the victor.
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2022
    louis54 likes this.
  9. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,573
    36,139
    Jan 8, 2017
    . Spot on, mate
     
    Reinhardt and Tockah like this.
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,582
    46,193
    Feb 11, 2005
    Ketchel just looks horrible on film. I don't see how a ranked middleweight from just about any time in that past few decades doesn't clown him.
     
  11. Sallywynder

    Sallywynder Member banned Full Member

    477
    333
    Apr 3, 2022
    Ketchel, over 20 rnds...
     
  12. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 MONZON VS HAGLER 2025 banned Full Member

    19,057
    21,097
    Sep 22, 2021
    Even a 20 round fight with the old gloves and clinching, inside fighting etc. Ketchel also had enough pop to drop and hurt HW? I have a hard time seeing a natural 140lbs fighter standing up to those odds.
     
    Ney likes this.
  13. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    712
    May 22, 2007
    20 rounds old rules favor Stanley as rough as Duran could be being he's smaller, weaker and far less powerful at this weight. His performance against Barkley was amazing but with the ref basically taking the night off and 20 rounds I got Stanley probably by stoppage.
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2022
    Unnecessarily Hostile likes this.
  14. Mark Dunham

    Mark Dunham Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,664
    890
    Mar 19, 2021
    Duran can not win the big win. He ties too easily. Ketchel roughs him up and takes a UD
     
  15. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,492
    5,250
    Jan 19, 2016
    Watch Ketchel on video, mate. You'll see what @Seamus, and anyone who uses their eyes rather than swallows the hyperbole of contemporary reports, sees. Ketchel was crap. I'm sorry if that seem so rude and dismissive but he just was. It's like watching Laurel and Hardy's film where Stanley boxes.

    The trouble is that, in those days, fights were only seen by local reporters, really. No newspaper was going to pay their sports reporter to travel across the country to cover a fight so you would get reports from a local reporter which were gushing as the fighter they were bestowing praise on was the best of a small group they had actually seen.

    Let's be realistic. Stanley Ketchel was only 24 when he died. He had spent a career drinking and carousing, hardly the lifestyle that creates greats. He had not benefitted from decades of the sport's evolution, nor had he travelled to enjoy different kinds of tutelage and sparring. Nothing in his lifestyle or training was conducive to an elite performer and that shows in the film we have of him which is so much more neutral and, therefore, accurate than the awestruck local reporter. And when you watch that footage, the thought of him being in there with a trained, experienced Duran - or anyone else elite - doesn't lead you to give him much of a chance.

    PS: I wouldn't put too much store in the KD of Johnson as giving Ketchel the power to drop and hurt a HW. I would question the legitimacy of the knock down - Johnson seemed to be falling before the punch failed to land - but even if it did land, Johnson's subsequent immediate reaction shows how little he was hurt.
     
    Entaowed and Mark Dunham like this.