HW punching power 10 ( scale 1-10 )

Vlad's chin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wilder's chin

Plus Haye was a much smaller man and had a broken toe.

 

Klitschko 10
one of the biggest punchers in heavyweight history
Wilder 8
untested against good competition
Haye 8
which heavy did he spark out?
Helenius 7
where is his power against good competition
Joshua 8
looks promising but untested
Stiverne 7
Ortiz 8
looks for real

Parker 6
Briggs 7
Ustinov 5
Povetkin 8
great accurace and very good power

 

Punching power is a bogus term. Ortiz probably has the best uppercut, Klitschko probably has the most devastating straight right, Wilder probably has the most effective power jab, Joshua can probably swing a more fatal hook than anyone else, Mansour probably has the best overhand and so on.

 

Good summation. What would you give Fury?

 

10 is perfection
as your catergory is power this comes into play when you reach world class
countless boxers have huge ko records before they step up in class and when they do there ko ratio goes down
if that is the case then they are not a 10
not in my book.

on all that list possibly wlad
but i gave him the highest marks

p4p he probably hits the 1 punch hardest when he actually commits to a shot and throws .

wlads kod lots of top 10 heavys and knocked down countless others.
thats the proof of his power.

he hits harder than his brother.

 

Furious one. 1.5

 

Very good point

I agree

 

After his fight with Joseph Parker someone asked Jason Bergman (who had been training with Povetkin and then Wilder in the 6 months before the fight with Parker) how Parker compares with them, he avoided the question of power and skill in regards to Wilder - seeming to be putting across that he didn't want to burn bridges (ie, he didn't say anything nice), and was basically using Povetkin as the bench mark for skill and power...and continued on to say that while Parker still has things to iron out his power is on par with Povetkins.

Agreed (and I've had a rant on the same thing) on the power/technique/timing thing, power isn't the right term - devastation or effectiveness may be better.

 

0

helenius is a big man
he has heavy hands because of his size
but he gets little body torque into then
they are not deleiverd with much speed
and they lack snap

he is not and will never be a big puncher 22=0 about 13 ko at the level he is fighting proves it.

povetkin is more a heavy handed accumilation puncher but he has power /
stiverne the same
briggs cannot even deliver a shot anymore/to much weights have meant he is now a slow arm puncher
haye is small for a heavy but his punches are obviously fast and with a lot of power / more so than the other 4/ just he is more tentative about whats coming back in big fights to try and land his bomb.

 

A combination of Self deception & Primal fear, makes short/stubby intimidated primates believe that Wilder doesn't punch a 10 down their spine

[YT]7xR6zKR0bTQ[/YT]

Nobody punches as hard as Wilder :smoke

10 = Wilder

Anything else is 9 & under

 

Stiverne - the only top 10 guy Wilder has ever fought - said Arreola punched harder than Wilder. So Arreola is 11?

 

wilder 10 when his record for ko`s v top 10 opponents is zero
straight away that should mean he is not a ten.
only wlad on that list is tried and tested power v top 10 heavys.
knocking over soft opposition means you are powerful but the proof of power only really starts when the opposition you are fighting is proven.

 

Self Deception is good, all humans have it...Otherwise how can self-inflated stubby-out of shape primates, accept the fact that Wilder is the hardest puncher in human history.

[YT]7xR6zKR0bTQ[/YT]

 

Sweet Dreams punk :smoke

[YT]F2-UrjITaSc[/YT]