You made a significant point of it, and used it as a slight against Holmes. Others can make up their own mind :good Shavers had him in bad trouble for 1/2 a round in 20+ or whatever it was. Granted it was BIG trouble but the fact that Holmes dominated almost every other second AND took such an awesome punch and came back to dominate is incredible. Shavers also had Ali close to out tho not as openly obvious as Holmes. I respect Holmes had probs with many opponents, and accept it as a criticism. One's own perception will be pertinent here, but i see it as fighting down as i stated. Here is EXACTLY what you said. I totally stand by my original take, because you have definitely deviated from your original statement. Whilst i accept the contrary, i stand by what i said as i personally think he would have in all likelihood have beaten him. That's how highly i rate the man.
I'm with ya. I think he could blow some of them out. His overwhelming early firepower would be hell for some.
Louis Marciano Ali Foreman Lewis Dempsey Frazier Walcott Holyfield Tyson Charles Holmes Jeffries Johnson Liston Tunney Baer Schmeling
He had him in trouble in both fights. First: "I certainly don't agree that Holmes "in all likelihood" would have beaten Tyson. Sooner or later Tyson will proably land that right and then Holmes will have to survive against the greatest finisher since Louis. Not an easy task." Second: "I think that Tyson would get to him with the right more often than not at some point, and when he did Holmes would have a job surviving." ... with added clarification: "But it's certainly not a given that he would be finished off, since his recuperative powers and survival isntincts perhaps were on par even with Tysons' finishing." I don't see any "definite deviation" between these two. Saying that it's not an "easy task" to survive against Tyson when hurt, is not meant as Holmes wouldn't stand a chance doing it - rather it's aimed at that Holmes "in all likelihood" would beat Tyson.
It's true Fleaman. This place has been really cool for the best part of a year now...but in the past there have been PAGES and PAGES of savegry. Mostly good stuff though.
I know.....I meant in difference of opinion, I come here for a nice debate, unlike the General Forum As I previously said though, 'that's what we're here for' and this has been a good one.
I can surely see an argument for rating Bowe over the Klits H2H. He was more skilled than Vitaly and had a better chin than Wlad.
I would rank Bowe above both, but there is no way he should be below Wlad head to head if we are talking peak for peak.
Well Wlad is a much better and more talented fighter than vitali. more heart too. So if hes ahead of wlad, then hes defintley ahead of vitali.