Hypocrisy amongst Klitscko haters EXPOSED

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PartALLthaTImE, Jun 6, 2012.


Page 1 of 3
  1. PartALLthaTImE

    PartALLthaTImE Active Member Full Member

    553
    38
    Mar 20, 2010
    Ok so Vitali chose Manuel Charr for his last fight.


    Most people here, myself included feel that this is not exactly a great fight nor a very exciting one.



    BUT: Klitscko haters are now throwing around names like "Wach" in every thread. These are the same people who would criticise the Klitsckos for fighting "sloth" "Bum" "glass chin" Wach. -> Charr's record is not worse than Wach's



    FACT if any heavyweight apart from the KO Bros managed to defeat or even K.O. Charr, that would be a major achievement. Charr is undefeated, has never been knocked down, in fact he hasn't even been hurt in one of his fights.


    If Haye, Chisora, Price or Fury knocked Charr out, the Brits would go wild wanking over this.

    If Mitchell, Wilder, etc. managed that the Americans would have celebratory Big Macs

    If Wach, Adamek or Szpilka destroyed Charr, the Polaks would feast on Klobasa and Vodka for the rest of their lifes.



    -> Even Klitscko haters apply different standards on opposition, disregarding otherwise solid HW from even having the slightest chance of giving Vitali trouble, proving that the Klitsckos are in fact GREAT



    -> Charr is not great, but ok. There have been many better challengers, but also many worse ones.
     
    PartALLthaTImE, Jun 6, 2012
    PartALLthaTImE, Jun 6, 2012
    #1
  2. rapidfire

    rapidfire Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,655
    2
    Jun 17, 2007
    Charr got gift decisions vs. Page, Bidenko and Carrion. Enough said.
     
    rapidfire, Jun 6, 2012
    rapidfire, Jun 6, 2012
    #2
  3. king khan

    king khan Boxing Junkie banned

    10,733
    0
    Apr 9, 2012
    agree. . . it's lose/lose with the haters. . . they can't accept the fistic greatness. . .


    the guy will either be too green, too shot, etc. . .


    then there's the fact that most of these guys handlers want NO PART of a klitschko.

    as of now, charr is more deserving than david haye. . .
     
    king khan, Jun 6, 2012
    king khan, Jun 6, 2012
    #3
  4. Longcount

    Longcount boxing Full Member

    5,107
    3
    Nov 1, 2009
    The quality of Charr's opposition has been awful. He also is not a puncher.

    Woeful match.
     
    Longcount, Jun 6, 2012
    Longcount, Jun 6, 2012
    #4
  5. TaylorSwift12

    TaylorSwift12 Guest

    What about your bias?

    You said that in one of your posts 'Chad Dawson should avenge his losses, because you are not a real champion if you don't avenge your losses, so Dawson should have go FIght Pasquel first'

    Or something like that.

    you stress avenging losses and beating guys that beat you.

    Yet LEWIS avenged both his losses

    Wladimir avenged 1 of 3.


    See

    haters are just blinded
     
    TaylorSwift12, Jun 6, 2012
    TaylorSwift12, Jun 6, 2012
    #5
  6. Chairman

    Chairman Active Member Full Member

    514
    0
    Jun 3, 2012
    Everybody knows that the Klitschkos are better than all the other heavyweights in the world.

    Vitali still needs to fight David Haye but apart from that... we're not haters, its just ****ing boring.

    I respect both of them.
     
    Chairman, Jun 6, 2012
    Chairman, Jun 6, 2012
    #6
  7. king khan

    king khan Boxing Junkie banned

    10,733
    0
    Apr 9, 2012

    klitschkos are a two-headed monster. . . as long as one avenges the other, it's all that counts. . .

    pascal/dawson is different situation. . yes, i think dawson needs to beat pascal before he truly considers himself numero uno @ 175. . but others have different opinions - that's the nature of boxing baby!


    and vitali didn't get a chance to avenge his loss by default, because he scared the poor bugger into retirement!
     
    king khan, Jun 6, 2012
    king khan, Jun 6, 2012
    #7
  8. king khan

    king khan Boxing Junkie banned

    10,733
    0
    Apr 9, 2012
    Andre Ward is so brilliant in the ring! So is Hopkins! I love watching them fight!


    Wladimir Klitschko sucks, and is boring as hell. . .


    Deduce as necessary. . . .
     
    king khan, Jun 6, 2012
    king khan, Jun 6, 2012
    #8
  9. Box84

    Box84 Active Member Full Member

    520
    0
    Jun 20, 2009
    I'm not a Klitschko hater but I totally disagree. Charr is at a similar level to Audley Harrison when he fought Haye. It's only fair that the fight receives a similar level of ridicule.
     
    Box84, Jun 6, 2012
    Box84, Jun 6, 2012
    #9
  10. TaylorSwift12

    TaylorSwift12 Guest

    Did you seriously just say

    if one klithscko avenge the other

    it counts for both?

    Are you trying to be like vladimir23 now with your trolling?

    Or dreaming even higher? Trying to copy me?
     
    TaylorSwift12, Jun 6, 2012
    TaylorSwift12, Jun 6, 2012
    #10
  11. Vidic

    Vidic Rest in Peace Manny Full Member

    13,207
    11
    Nov 23, 2010
    King Khan is going on ignore

    not sure why I didn't do it before

    Skimming past his posts is getting boring
     
    Vidic, Jun 6, 2012
    Vidic, Jun 6, 2012
    #11
  12. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Who is Manuel Charr? Is that who Vitali is really fighting next? This fight is a waste. I'm not sure why Vitali just doesn't hang em up.
     
    BigReg, Jun 6, 2012
    BigReg, Jun 6, 2012
    #12
  13. Dee

    Dee Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,217
    3
    May 21, 2011
    This.:deal
     
    Dee, Jun 6, 2012
    Dee, Jun 6, 2012
    #13
  14. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    :lol::lol::lol::lol::patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch
     
    canucks9314, Jun 6, 2012
    canucks9314, Jun 6, 2012
    #14
  15. king khan

    king khan Boxing Junkie banned

    10,733
    0
    Apr 9, 2012
    :lol:
     
    king khan, Jun 6, 2012
    king khan, Jun 6, 2012
    #15
Page 1 of 3