Hypocrisy of work rate vs. certain fighters

Even ole' Al on Showtime admitted that when Broner would connect, Paulie would dish out his own offense, the opposite was the case for Broner, he would stop throwing lots of times. The damage was on par, if that is the case, you go with what is the most effective punches, and ring generalship, I guess you folks call that running on the bike, aye? Paulie's jab was the most effective punch in a lot of cases, both on offense and defense.

 

You're blind and don't know **** if that's your view of the fight. The most effective punch of the fight was Broner's right hand.

Did Al have Paulie winning? No.
Did Bernard have Paulie winning? No.
Did Press Row have Paulie winning? No.

The people that work with Paulie at Showtime had him losing the fight. If they have any bias, it'd be FOR Paulie, and they had him losing. People need to STFU, they are making themselves look stupid.

 

Al had 115-113 Broner, which I've said is a fair card. 117-111 is just Broner fanboism.

 

You can count punches all you want too but I know an ass whoopin when I see one and last night, Paulie got his hat handed to him. People are not judging the fight but instead the fighters. Replace Paulie with Mayweather and Broner with Canelo and the criticism would be a total flipflop.

 

Broner definitely won. He landed the more effective punches, and he landed more punches.