Sounds durable as ****, fought **** loadsa times and was never stopped. Will deffo have that off ya'. Hopefully someone who has already see him can comment on your matchup! Jimmy Wilde vs Santos Laciar over 15 :good
LAciar had pretty good defensive skills as well.Typical versatile Argentinian fighter, in a similar bracket to Galindez, Ahumada etc..
Well as a big admirer of Galindez i'm looking forward to seeing him. How does he fare against compatriot Perez?
Wilde has that terrific punch, but I think the ultra smooth Laciar can keep out of harm's way & capture a 15 round decision over the long haul for a 15 rd . UD. Tony Lopez .Vs. Rocky Juarez 12 Rounds.
I'll have to go for Tyson, he was better, though i not that's not reason to be picking him here i'm using it as an excuse. Tyson vs Johnson
Tyson starts fast and comes out swinging and landing on the open Tua and hurts him early. Tuas tough and starts to try and fight back but Tysons too fast and beats him on Points. Riddick Bowe vs Jack dempsey over 20 rounds IGNORE TEET is too quick
Jack Johnson? I would have to go with Johnson. He easily toyed with Ketchel, a simular swarmer type like Tyson. Johnson was very strong & was very good at delivering sweeping upercuts, with great authority. (Tyson's achillies heel). He would hurt Tyson with upercuts & finish him off in about the sixth round.
Hard to say because i rate Turpin personally, but it's very clear he was beatable, and by rugged fighting types such as Minter too, as he was beaten by Olson. Turpin's best win sometimes gets tainted by detractors who like to say Robinson wasn't 'on' that night, but Turpin fought great, fighting behind a ramrod jab. It would be an intense fight, but i reckon that spearing jab would give Turpin the edge in the exchanges. Gene Fulmer vs Tony Zale