Hypothetical P4P Pacman

what has bradley done p4p, what has guzman done p4p, what has campbell done p4p? nothing.....

these guys dont even deserve to be in the same arena as manny let alone the same ring, its stupid to even think so.....

hatton beat tszyu, won a title against collazo at 147 and had only 1 defeat out of 46 fights when he fought manny.....

those guys you keep mentioning arent even in hatton's league when it come s to acheivements in boxing history....

its just dumb to say guzman, bradley, and campbell are real "forces" at 140....we don't know....we do know hatton was proven elite 140 fighter when he fought manny and manny won......

WTF? man

 

But someone here said that Hatton was the weakest link in 140lbs.atsch

Maybe you could argue with him, but me, i gave up...:-(

 

WTF

You've been putting Pac down on so many of your post, how much have you read up on his career and many of his fights have you actually seen?

Did you even know that he fought Ledwaba 5x def. champ on 2 wk. notice, Barrera 2x (1st fight on 1 month notice), Morales 3x, and JMM twice?

 

He keeps using the word "FANTASY", he didn't even know that it back fired to him...there's no arguing with that guy...geeeez!!!!

 

No Doubt, he did earn it, your right and I wont argue against that.
My only problem is Hatton also was blessed to have a great personality and a backing of a nation behind him because if he did not have that, based on merely his actual ring performances I wouldn't rate him because he's lost every big fight he's had, and I say this because he got a gift against Collazo in my opinion too...and his claim to fame was beating a shot to pieces Castillo and some arguably would say a past his prime on the downslide Kostya Tzsyu. But I am just quoting what others have said.

 

I've got all Pac's fight dude so if you feel that qualifies someone to have an opinion then I am qualified...

Peace

 

There is no arguing because I am hitting you back with boxing talk but your hitting me with fantasy. I want to hear reality not fantasy

 

There you have it....Just what I've said, they ranked fighters based on records...are achievements & resume NOT records???

Anyway, now, compare Hattons and Bradley's "achievements & resume".....

Now, who's the ****ing stupid now dumb****???

You just don't get it do you???

 

What boxing talk???:huh

 

Again thats your opinions and if you want to go off achievements bro lets get real detailed.

Boxing Politics right??? - Are you aware of this???

If you take away Hatton's fanbase and Hatton's marketability.

What do you have???

An ordinary fighter who was good but never got the hype and backing behind him to land big fights to achieve the things he has now achieved.

My question to you is, if you took the same backing Hatton has and gave it to all 3 of those guys then what would we be talking about right now???

I am real brother, so when you talk to me I can go into every single different avenue as to what if and why's

Hatton was fortunate to have the drawing power and fanbase because if he didn't he would still be fighting for the british and european title, trust me...

 

if you have no respect for pac and what he has achieved i believe that you will never respect the guy so forget you. real fans and experts now he is the real deal, just look at his resume.

 

solid chin sounds just like nallege.

if he does win against so and so, he will not earn respect from me. who the hell are you again?

i mean jesus christ, hatton is the weakest link among whom.

are you serious bro, or seriously ******ed?

guzman, bradley? holt, campbell. wtf.

 

What was you saying again???

I quoted and corrected you so what point was you trying to make, I told you skill does have something to do with rankings and you obviously dont think it does.

 

I respect Pac dont get it twisted. He is a good fighter, my argument has nothing to do with that...

 

Are you not aware of the title of the thread or are you just as your name suggests?