I admit that all the Loma hype confuses me an is annoying

Weird thread from a weird verbose poster. A stupid contradictory rant telling fans what they can and cannot do while constantly moving the goal posts and redefining the sports lexicon.

Boards are full of these hallway monitors and their self righteous drivel.

I for one will continue to enjoy Loma even "hype" him to whomever I please and to whatever extent I wish and nobody can prevent me.

 

Just like soap!

 

You downplay everything he has done as a pro, and get a kick out of doing it. Don't know why you are arguing about this, people that are objective about a fighter are just that. They don't focus on passing off everything thing that fighter has done as no big deal, while also having the 1 time he was put on his ass as their avatar. You are pretty much the anti-loma fan, so why do you deny it, it's obvious.

 

Can you name JUST ONE specific thing I've said that is unreasonable though. I don't think I downplay it, I feel like I'm objective. I give him credit for wins he deserves credit for, and I don't give him for fights like Rigo because of perfectly logical reasons.

The avatar and my sig is a joke lol. Don't take it so seriously bro.

 

**** you

 

So why give him no credit for Rigo?

Even if it’s vastly over rated which I agree, why give him no credit?

Yet you claim you are unbiased proudly??

 

I explained it already. Rigo was nearly 40, inactive, had not been in there with a relevant fighter for half a decade, almost got decapitated by Amagasa, and jumped up 2 weight classes when he was tiny at 122 already.

 

Okay here's one recent post.

Lomachenko did have a shoulder injury that after required surgery, yet here you are downplaying it if not outright calling bs.

Just one of many passive agressive loma troll posts from you.

 

That's an unreasonable post? To call out Loma stans for making every kind of excuse. Injuries are part of the game. It's just funny when Loma looks vulnerable all the excuses come out. How is that unreasonable to call it out?

 

I think I'm critical of Loma not a "hater". I think a hater will be unreasonable while someone who is critical thinks outside the box and isn't like every other sheep on here scared to criticize Loma.

 

And Loma should get ZERO credit for out classing him the way he did?

Like Zero??

Let me ask you a question, Fluid was bigger than Pac and PAC had already been KOed, should Fluid receive any credit for that win or Zero?

 

Dude, You are stuck in the box without realizing it. To make matters worse it’s a Jack in the Box.

Pop goes the weasel!!!

Look ellerbe is thinking outside the box again.

Dooiing

 

Uh Pac had been fighting at that weight for YEARS and dominated a top 3 p4p WW in Bradley. Pac also was younger than Floyd and fought relevant fights unlike Rigo who didn't fight a relevant fight in 5 years. Now Marquez is a better comparison but the difference is this was Floyd's coming out of retirement party. I don't give Floyd much credit but way more than Rigo since Marquez had been active and Floyd had been inactive. Marquez was also the lineal champ, who has Rigo really beat?

 

Hang on a second, fair post by the way, ok, you just said you don’t give fluid MUCH credit and way more than with Lomas win over Rigo,,,,,,

But we are debating you giving Loma ZERO credit???????

So you are now conceding you need to give him at least some?

Because that was my point to you, you tricky freakin weasel, see why I keep calling you that you trickster???

Sheesh, what I put up with on this forum.

 

You are a Loma Stan of a different kind, can't stop talking about him but it's all bad lol.