I agree with Tyson as well. He should've gave him 1 of those patented uppercuts right in the nuts instead of biting him though.
I also think that Holyfield tried to butt Tyson in both fights. Holyfield constantly came up and rubbed his head against Tyson time and time again. I know that's how he fights but a lot of it seemed intentional. When a guy is being that blatantly obvious, it would **** me off too.
Of course it would **** anybody off, but then you show you rage by knocking your opponent the **** out, not by biting his ear then after being warned that you will get DQd, doing it again.
Tyson should have 'fouled within the rules' by headbutting back and going low on the inside and hitting hips inside
For the part where...how come was Holyfield never warned for headbutts ? The same applies with Hopkins...they get away with it because they do it fighting smart when they can get away with it looking unintentional !! Mike had never been the same after the Spinks fight when he fired his co-manager and his trainer Kevin Rooney. Therefore he wasn't ready mentally for a guy like Holyfield afterwards.....just like Buster Douglas who stood his ground the same way !!
Didnt the Rhaman fight prove unequivocally that Holyfield uses his head constantly, purposelly and forcefully as a weapon, even at times as his #1 weapon? The guy is a proven roided up freak who butted constantly. Your an idiot if you fell for his "Im a Christian" nonsense. At least Tyson makes no bones about the fact that hes crazy. Holyfield has pulled the wool over everyones eyes for years. Of course he butted Tyson in both fight. Of course he did it on purpose and of course some sort of points should have been taken. and of course Tyson should not have bit him.
Holyfield was bringing his head up constantly- look at him do it just before the second bite. Tyson knew the cut would get worse, that Mills lane was ineffective in doing his job