I agree with tyson... (holyfield heabutting)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kirk, Feb 27, 2008.


  1. josak

    josak Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,018
    16
    Jan 4, 2007
    thats one of the most unintentionally funny interviews ever.
     
  2. MacManJr.

    MacManJr. Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,111
    6
    Jul 11, 2007
    I agree with Tyson as well. He should've gave him 1 of those patented uppercuts right in the nuts instead of biting him though.
     
  3. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    I also think that Holyfield tried to butt Tyson in both fights. Holyfield constantly came up and rubbed his head against Tyson time and time again. I know that's how he fights but a lot of it seemed intentional. When a guy is being that blatantly obvious, it would **** me off too.
     
  4. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Of course it would **** anybody off, but then you show you rage by knocking your opponent the **** out, not by biting his ear then after being warned that you will get DQd, doing it again.
     
  5. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Funny how it only pisses an opponent off when they're getting the crap beat out of them!:deal
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Tyson should have 'fouled within the rules' by headbutting back and going low on the inside and hitting hips inside
     
  7. pasky2000

    pasky2000 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,119
    0
    Nov 4, 2007

    For the part where...how come was Holyfield never warned for headbutts ? The same applies with Hopkins...they get away with it because they do it fighting smart when they can get away with it looking unintentional !!

    Mike had never been the same after the Spinks fight when he fired his co-manager and his trainer Kevin Rooney. Therefore he wasn't ready mentally for a guy like Holyfield afterwards.....just like Buster Douglas who stood his ground the same way !!
     
  8. LeeGenius

    LeeGenius Guest

    Didnt the Rhaman fight prove unequivocally that Holyfield uses his head constantly, purposelly and forcefully as a weapon, even at times as his #1 weapon?



    The guy is a proven roided up freak who butted constantly. Your an idiot if you fell for his "Im a Christian" nonsense. At least Tyson makes no bones about the fact that hes crazy. Holyfield has pulled the wool over everyones eyes for years.


    Of course he butted Tyson in both fight. Of course he did it on purpose and of course some sort of points should have been taken.

    and of course Tyson should not have bit him.
     
  9. bill poster

    bill poster Guest

    Holyfield was bringing his head up constantly- look at him do it just before the second bite. Tyson knew the cut would get worse, that Mills lane was ineffective in doing his job