This thread isn't about GGG winning clearly or not. I'm simply saying that this is the same GGG we've been seeing on HBO. He just hasn't fought someone like Jacobs. I'm only pulling the robbery card with this GGG fanboy to show how stupid his argument is. This is how morons argue "If you don't agree with me ydksab" "come back to me when you know a thing or two about the game"
Jacobs deserves credit but Jacobs is no all-time talent. The fact he made it so close and arguably won against Golovkin indicates that historically GGG can't be held in the same special regard. Which is fine, he can be on the tier below. I'd love to see him against Briscoe and Valdez and Zale and Fullmer.
Kovalev wasn't effective after the 4th??? Hahahahahaha. Stick to to tiddlywinks cos you know fcuk all about boxing!
I don't understand the "old" argument. You don't coincidentally turn old when you fight your best opponent.