I believe Lara schoooools Canelo!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Round1gymDC, Apr 21, 2013.


  1. Matty lll

    Matty lll Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,903
    21
    Jan 21, 2011
  2. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Canelo is faster, more pop then vanes in which lara look bad and boring vs vanes.
     
  3. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Based on lara last 2 fights, canelo will beat him. Lara doesn't throw a lot of punches. He basically waits for counters. Trout is a proven fighter by beating cotto while lara best win (he lost but was robbed badly) vs decline shot Williams who was coming off a ktfo terribly to Martinez.
     
  4. pound

    pound Coqui Radar Full Member

    6,791
    9
    Nov 2, 2009
    Vanes has a better shot to beat Canelo? You must be out of your mind lol.
     
  5. GoldenArms

    GoldenArms Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,326
    242
    Jan 24, 2009
    Canelo would beat his ass
     
  6. LACMEXAME

    LACMEXAME Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,106
    0
    Jan 2, 2013
    This has nothing to do with what I said. My point is that you have to consider everything going into a fight. Having a strong chin is an obvious advantage. That means that you have better chance of not touching the canvas or possibly get KO'd, if you get hit flush. It's real simple to understand.
     
  7. LACMEXAME

    LACMEXAME Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,106
    0
    Jan 2, 2013
    I used the word suspect as in "suspicious", "not sure", "not knowing". I didn't mean it as if I knew for a fact he had a weak chin. But since you're already certain he doesn't, then I guess you shouldn't worry about it then. I think it was the same with Rigo. I personally didn't say he had a glass jaw or anything like that. I just didn't know.