No i think you missed what i was saying(my point). I meant that this is a sport of boxing, and i mentioned that because you said floyd runs. I wasnt comparing the two technically, the only thing i compared was tyson's fights and him being different in how they executed their respective discipline(boxing). Tyson was just more aggressive in his practice in the art of "boxing"
Put all your VCash on Hatton. And sunday morning when Mayweather is still the champ and Hatton tissue-paper skin is freshly stitched up and Mayweather is barely swollen come back on here and keep preaching your expertise on the sport. As an unbiased predictor, Floyd is the way to go. Styles make fights. :good
Exactly. That would be like comparing Mayweather's knock out rate with Tyson's. It would be an unfair comparison to Pretty Void. However, we can compare the two in terms of who has caused much more excitment in the sport not only among regular fans, but also across the board and incorporating those people who wouldn't normaly bother to watch a fight, let alone pay to see one. I mean, in terms of popularity and street recognition. And in that respect, Tyson beats Mayweather by far. Hell, even DLH beats Pretty Void in that arena. Not even close.
Tyson was one of the greats, had hands as fast as middleweights, incredible head movement, incredible defense, crunching power. One of the most technically sound Heavies ever. A legend.
You picked Hatton to beat Floyd. I predicted Floyd would beat Hatton after a rough couple first rounds. Obviously I know my **** more then you. :rofl