I dont care what anyone says.....James Toney is better and would beat .......

I wouldnt like it, but??? Tell me you werent disgusted against RJJ either:nono

 

Toney had more power at SM in my opinion which could be a factor, but Toney on his best night vs Calazaghe on his best night Toney wins. It sucks that Toney cant stay in shape and now has to resort to steroids to enhance his ability.

 

Nobody was confused as to what you meant by HOF. What you said, though, is 'Toney would beat him to the HOF'. Like in some hypothetical fictitious race. When in fact they'd both be blown away by...

This content is protected

 

i think it's pretty safe to assume that calfaggi would beat thadzi and griffin, and rather easily i might add......

 

wow, i didn't know that thadzi and griffin were that highly regarded.....well, at leat by some tards around here.....

 

Calzaghe wins wide - 117-111. He has the worst style for Toney to adapt against outside of Roy Jones.

Jones runs and explodes, Calzaghe constantly explodes, but with less speed and precision than Jones.

 

Problem is that Toney shells up far too much against speed, he'd get the right in at times, but not enough and he'd get tied up a lot and would have to deal with that, plus the fact that he shells into his shoulder roll, this leaves him open for awkward angle shots.

It's an easy night for Calzaghe relatively, by way of styles.

Calzaghe also obliterates Nunn, Eubank, Benn and the rest of the guys under Jones at that time.

 

You don't even know what you are talking about. Toney shells into his guard/shoulder roll when blitzed with a speed attack and is exceptionally open to awkward angles from that position.

I also recognise fighters from all era's, I have more knowledge than you will ever know.

You are nothing more than a **** starter.

 

Calzaghe is the greatest fighter of all time, when you learn to accept this, you will be mentally set free.

Go on now, it's bed time for the little people.