I ain’t going through this shite again I’ve already made threads before countering these points, you can find them if you care to. One of the most blatant sparring session fake fight I have ever seen.
"Wlad didn’t have outstanding wins stop deluding yourself. Name me three impressive victories" Neither did Kovalev or Golovkin by that standard. Maybe not Usyk or Lomachenko either. You confuse your opinion with fact, "impressive victories" is a good example of this. What constitutes an impressive victory? Is dominating a highly ranked contender impressive? Is reigning on top of the HW division for 9.5 years impressive? Another example is thinking your opinion of how a fight should be scored is objective when scoring is significantly subjective (one reason why there's so much disagreement). Compubox had Lopez outlanding Lomachenko 183-141, throwing 659 punches to Loma's 321. He nearly doubled Loma in power punches landed. He was only outlanded by Loma in 3 rounds. I haven't looked at the RBR but I have no doubt that most scored it for Lopez, with a fair number scoring it wide for Lopez. Watching it live I was left with the clear feeling that while it was competitive, Lopez did enough to win. Fights aren't scored in 0.25 from a variety of different angles, they are scored by three guys with one angle on the action apiece, in real time. So if one guy is massively outthrowing the other even if he's landing a similar number, he will likely be credited with more lands because the judges have to use their discretion on whether to score some attempts. If Loma-Lopez was a "robbery" (a fight that the majority of fans thought Lopez won) then any fight where you disagree with the result, even by a round, becomes a "robbery". "Who else is beating top guys 20lbs more than them?" I'd have to know all of the in-ring weights to know for a start.
You've countered nothing in the past when I've gone back and forth with you. Didn't you predict that Bivol would lose to Canelo? You could never square that circle.