Yes you must be right. Tyson Fury has never been banned and that is why he has never appealed and never has a hearing of said appeal in November. I know he is a nutter, but is Tyson even nutty enough to appeal a ban he doesn't have?
He should be striped he's cancelled the fight twice with no intention to defend his title insted of training he's out partying
Things going bad to worse for Fury. His outspoken use of cocaine has likely landed him in trouble with the BBBOC, they are looking into the possibility of taking away his license. Fury needs to learn to keep his mouth shut, he's only digging a bigger hole for himself. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/37563759
I think Fury is a problem H2H for just about any HW in history. Height, reach, speed, can fight orthodox or southpaw, can fight on the inside, and has an awkward style.
tried to multi quote but didnt get it right. Look at the posts from the poster who said that Fury hadnt been found of anything and how certain things can produce certain results. If that poster is correct, which is similar to what I had read, then he should not be stripped
Why are you comparing Wlad and Wilder? Wlad had been a long running champ and like many long running champs they have a few gimmes, but Wilder hasnt been a long running champ. I doubt you knew much of Duhaupas before he fought Wilder and would only call it decent because he pushed Wilder and had a good result after. Had he been blown away, would you still have rated it?
Once again you are confusing yourself. So Wilder isnt holding up a division because he only has one title but not facing top tier isnt holding anything up. Also there is Joshua with a title and there is talk of Parker and Ruiz facing for the vacant WBO, so you really are waffling. Fury made the division exciting because he beat Wlad. Before that, Wlad was dominating and there were what many thought of as no top challenges, but Fury beat Wlad and suddenly there was an undefeated champ that possibly looked more beatable, as well as 2 other undefeated champs where people struggle to pick winners rather than a dominant champ
I'm well aware of the issues with nandrolone and how false results can be given. But if it was naturally occurring from exercise it would be rare, if it was common then every athlete that trained would often test positive for nandrolone and that clearly doesn't happen. Combine that with the fact Hughie also tested positive, you have a situation where 2 people from the same stable having a very, very rare positive nandrolone results from exercise at the same time. The chances of that happening are astronomical. So the likely hood is that the nandrolone was not naturally occurring but from an outside source. If the nandrolone came from a supplement they took then all they would have to do is name the supplements they took and the batch for each supplement and if possible they would be tested for any contamination. Fact is however the Fury's allegedly tested positive for nandrolone it's the Fury's responsibility to ensure they do not take anything that could lead to a failed test. Even in occurrences when it's found it was from contaminated supplements a ban is still usually issued as it's the athletes responsibility to ensure what he is taking is clean, though in these cases the ban tends to be shorter.
The most deserving to be stripped of any heavyweight in recent memory Strip that dope-head, moron His party life should no longer be disturbed by something as trivial and meaningless as a boxing match
I should think this alone deserves a strip let alone Wlad should sue use him for breach of the contract