I dont think Fury should be stripped of his titles

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bailey, Oct 3, 2016.


  1. lawslaw

    lawslaw Active Member Full Member

    1,290
    541
    Sep 10, 2016
    Yes you must be right. Tyson Fury has never been banned and that is why he has never appealed and never has a hearing of said appeal in November.

    I know he is a nutter, but is Tyson even nutty enough to appeal a ban he doesn't have?:facepalm:
     
  2. Ph33rknot

    Ph33rknot Live as if you were to die tomorrow Full Member

    22,816
    22,703
    Mar 5, 2012
    He should be striped he's cancelled the fight twice with no intention to defend his title insted of training he's out partying
     
  3. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,309
    29,487
    Apr 4, 2005
    Things going bad to worse for Fury. His outspoken use of cocaine has likely landed him in trouble with the BBBOC, they are looking into the possibility of taking away his license.

    Fury needs to learn to keep his mouth shut, he's only digging a bigger hole for himself.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/37563759
     
  4. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,901
    2,157
    Feb 8, 2008
    Precisely
     
  5. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,901
    2,157
    Feb 8, 2008
    Except they are appealing.... they are doing exactly what Tony thompson did...
     
  6. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    I think Fury is a problem H2H for just about any HW in history.

    Height, reach, speed, can fight orthodox or southpaw, can fight on the inside, and has an awkward style.
     
    Hattonmad and rossle like this.
  7. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
  8. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    tried to multi quote but didnt get it right.

    Look at the posts from the poster who said that Fury hadnt been found of anything and how certain things can produce certain results. If that poster is correct, which is similar to what I had read, then he should not be stripped
     
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Why are you comparing Wlad and Wilder? Wlad had been a long running champ and like many long running champs they have a few gimmes, but Wilder hasnt been a long running champ.
    I doubt you knew much of Duhaupas before he fought Wilder and would only call it decent because he pushed Wilder and had a good result after. Had he been blown away, would you still have rated it?
     
  10. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Once again you are confusing yourself. So Wilder isnt holding up a division because he only has one title but not facing top tier isnt holding anything up. Also there is Joshua with a title and there is talk of Parker and Ruiz facing for the vacant WBO, so you really are waffling.
    Fury made the division exciting because he beat Wlad. Before that, Wlad was dominating and there were what many thought of as no top challenges, but Fury beat Wlad and suddenly there was an undefeated champ that possibly looked more beatable, as well as 2 other undefeated champs where people struggle to pick winners rather than a dominant champ
     
    kriszhao likes this.
  11. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,309
    29,487
    Apr 4, 2005
    I'm well aware of the issues with nandrolone and how false results can be given. But if it was naturally occurring from exercise it would be rare, if it was common then every athlete that trained would often test positive for nandrolone and that clearly doesn't happen. Combine that with the fact Hughie also tested positive, you have a situation where 2 people from the same stable having a very, very rare positive nandrolone results from exercise at the same time. The chances of that happening are astronomical. So the likely hood is that the nandrolone was not naturally occurring but from an outside source.

    If the nandrolone came from a supplement they took then all they would have to do is name the supplements they took and the batch for each supplement and if possible they would be tested for any contamination.

    Fact is however the Fury's allegedly tested positive for nandrolone it's the Fury's responsibility to ensure they do not take anything that could lead to a failed test. Even in occurrences when it's found it was from contaminated supplements a ban is still usually issued as it's the athletes responsibility to ensure what he is taking is clean, though in these cases the ban tends to be shorter.
     
    kriszhao likes this.
  12. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,383
    3,795
    Feb 20, 2008
    He admitted he faked the ankle injury to get out of the fight. Strip this loser.
     
    kriszhao likes this.
  13. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,383
    3,795
    Feb 20, 2008
    Nandrolone isn't naturally occurring in the human body. Anyone posting that is mistaken and a fool.
     
  14. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005
    The most deserving to be stripped of any heavyweight in recent memory



    Strip that dope-head, moron

    His party life should no longer be disturbed by something as trivial and meaningless as a boxing match
     
  15. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,901
    2,157
    Feb 8, 2008
    I should think this alone deserves a strip let alone Wlad should sue use him for breach of the contract