I dont think Ward is a top boxer. That doesnt mean not a top fighter.

hiding in denial

 

So now the low blow is exaggerated? lol.
What is this exaggerating as usual. Show any examples of exaggeration

you see here that you cant even bring yourself to admit what you have seen. Thats hiding in denial

So you think several low blows, as shown in the video are acceptable and dont take a toll?
This is why you cant have a sensible debate.
If a blow is low, its not legal. get that?

They were all fouls

This content is protected

Below Loudon exposes his motives

Yes you do. You are obsessed with him and seem to want to mention him and have it in your head that Ward fouling someone can be related to Calzaghe? Thats odd and you are obsessed. Thats why I have begun to wonder if you and Herol are the same person.
1. mention of Calzaghe

Question me on a related thread rather than bringing up something irrelevant just because of your obsession with Calzaghe
2. mention of Calzaghe

3. mention of Calzaghe

The fighter Loudon brought up on a completely unrelated thread, who he doesnt want to talk about

He has had alot of credit for it. You have dismissed what you didnt want to see, to suit your agenda

Watch the video.
Fortunately for Bowe, his fight wasnt called a KO loss

The Joke...
4. mention of Calzaghe

And again...
5. mention of Calzaghe

Why are you still going on about Calzaghe who you dont want to talk about?

6. mention of Calzaghe

You cant find double standards. You take parts you want and ignore other parts to suit an agenda and have been exposed as LLL for it

Not everybody new that at all. Here you are trying to rewrite history. Tyson had blown out a contender in his previous fight been in a mega fight with Lewis and was picked to beat Williams

Isnt that established then? You win a Lonsdale belt outright for that.
So you talk of double standards but think 3 defences and 2 years as a champ is no different to never having had a world title fight before.
Double standards exposed there

7. mention of Calzaghe

8. mention of Calzaghe

9. mention of Calzaghe

10. mention of Calzaghe

Thius tells me now that you are plainly stupid and really obsessed with Calzaghe. The thread has no bearing on a retired fighter at all. It is a thread about a recent thread where a foul occurred which had a contraversial ending

11. mention of Calzaghe

Seems that is your concern. Enough to say you dont want to talk about someone but be concerned to bring them up another 11 or so times



Kovalev was fouled and when you look at the videos it looks very bad. That is the debate[/QUOTE]

 

Another subject

 

What are you going on about. A low blow is a low blow. It doesnt matter in rules sake if it hits someone completely in the groin or not. It is low and if you know anything, you would know areas like that are called low because they are more fragile areas of the body which are not to be hit

 

That looks like a post reaching for a friend

 

He likely didnt. Your posts do become long rambles

 

To deny low blows just exposes you as either completely disingenuous, or blind as a bat. Possibly even deluded to the point of hallucination

 

You still worried about Calzaghe. Faded Reid the fighter who had Froch wobbled, Bika who when inactive had Ward troubled or Hopkins who years later was Kovalevs big win and one of the reasons many rated Kovalev so highly

 

Still concerned?

 

Whats not to be serious about? I think overall it can be very arguable but that is another subject

 

Its no problem. I was trying to be nice and wouldnt have been able to accommodate an amateur outfit