I dont think Ward is a top boxer. That doesnt mean not a top fighter.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bailey, Aug 27, 2017.


  1. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    bailey,

    You claimed Andre landed a terrible low blow. Your words.

    Where?

    Show me?

    You can't.

    It was borderline.

    How can a borderline low blow be deemed as terrible?

    Admit what?

    It was a borderline low blow.

    If you can't/won't admit that, then you have serious issues.

    That video is absolutely pathetic.

    Seriously, it's cringeworthy.

    The majority of those shots landed on the red Krusher logo, which was above the Hublot logo.

    There's no way on earth they were low.

    Tony Weeks told Andre where the belt line was in his pre-fight instructions.

    The white band running across the top of Sergey's shorts, were where most of Andre's shots landed.

    How can that white band be classed as being low??

    Even the area where the Hublot logo was can't be deemed as being terribly low.

    Don't get upset because you've been found out.

    We both know that it pains you that people rate Andre higher than Joe.

    It's you who has the obsession.

    Again, I only bring his name up as examples to highlight your bias.

    This is a new low even by your standards.

    You couldn't answer any of my points.

    I've exposed your bias, yet all you could offer as a response, is how many times I've mentioned Joe's name?

    Oh dear.

    Yet another default answer because you can't give me an actual answer.

    Amateur hour.

    Seriously, it's extremely weak.


    An example:

    I said to you that I don't mind you listing Kessler's issues going into fights against Andre and Carl, but I don't like how at the same time, you completely ignore Eubank's circumstances going into the fight with Joe.

    Your response: "2. Mention of Calzaghe"


    I can't even class that as an answer.

    It's just pathetic.


    You have dug yourself a giant hole, and now you're desperately trying to dig yourself out of it. But you can't.

    You originally said that you didn't rate Andre's win over Carl, as Carl was faded. Yet when I highlight your bias and point out how highly you rate the Eubank win despite him also being faded and underprepared etc, you can only offer the following replies:

    1. "Eubank was more accomplished. Job done"

    2. "You're obsessed with Joe"


    Again, they can't even be classed as replies.

    They're just nothing answers.


    Regarding Danny Williams, yes, he got some credit, and rightly so. But overall, it didn't mean much, as Mike was finished at that point.

    The same applies with Joe's win over Eubank. Yes, he gets a lot of credit for beating a legend of British boxing in an exciting fight, which was the first big fight of his career. Of course he does. But you can't hail it as this great win, whilst dismissing Andre's easy win over Carl, based on the grounds that Carl was faded, when you know full well that Eubank was also faded. That is a prime example of double standards.
    The only thing that looks bad, is the clown who made it and the emotional fans like yourself who are driven by an agenda.

    If you seriously think that the red K on Sergey's shorts were in a low area, you need to go back to school and take an anatomy class, before going on to learn the rules of boxing.
     
  2. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Another nothing answer.
     
  3. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    The white band which Andre repeatedly hit, was not where Sergey Kovalev's testicles were.
     
  4. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    By asking which one of us he was referring to?

    Okay.
     
  5. oiky

    oiky Gypsy Boy Full Member

    4,577
    1,620
    Jan 17, 2014
    Ward is an exceptional rough houser
     
  6. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Only to someone like you who's incapable of an intelligent debate.
     
  7. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    He hasn't denied them.

    He has just pointed out that there's a world of difference between what happened in the Bowe-Golota fight.

    It's pathetic on your part to try and make a comparison between the two.
     
  8. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    I'm not worried about anyone.

    I was just giving him a reality check.
     
  9. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    It's not arguable at all.

    Sven Ottke's resume doesn't compare to Andre's.

    Just stop.
     
  10. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    No.
     
  11. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Wow 9 Alerts from a concerned, deluded Loudon.
    Will have a read through these and show how he is obsessed and worried about a certain fighter (just like Herol is) and how he is in denial on the thread subject

    Will be back
     
    mirkofilipovic likes this.
  12. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    I had 8 alerts from you yesterday.

    If you're going to come back, then come back with something of substance.

    Give me something to debate, instead of giving me the same tired and predicable default answers that reek of desperation.
     
    JackTheBoxingFan likes this.
  13. JackTheBoxingFan

    JackTheBoxingFan New Member Full Member

    4
    1
    Sep 8, 2017
    Wtf have I just read. You don't achieve what he's achieved in the sport by not being a good boxer. He boxed the **** outta the likes of; Ward, Kessler and Dawson. Tryna hate on SOG cos he's probs beaten all your fave fighters.
     
    Loudon likes this.
  14. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    A low blow is a low blow. It doesnt matter in rules sake if it hits someone completely in the groin or not. It is low and if you know anything, you would know areas like that are called low because they are more fragile areas of the body which are not to be hit
     
  15. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Whos this sad alt?